Difference between revisions of "User talk:TennaK"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Useful links
JamesWilson (talk | contribs) (reply) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Sorry about the hasty block! I just saw a revert reason for your contribution and read the diff wrong apparently, but you have been restored now. Please enjoy editing. Sorry!!--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 20:28, 28 September 2011 (EDT) | Sorry about the hasty block! I just saw a revert reason for your contribution and read the diff wrong apparently, but you have been restored now. Please enjoy editing. Sorry!!--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 20:28, 28 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
:I didn't even notice until you said something here! My earlier edit wasn't parody, I'll find some resources to back it up. --[[User:TennaK|TennaK]] 20:41, 28 September 2011 (EDT) | :I didn't even notice until you said something here! My earlier edit wasn't parody, I'll find some resources to back it up. --[[User:TennaK|TennaK]] 20:41, 28 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Please do. Those pages seem to be hotbeds for parody and heated discussion among other things, based on my experiences here. Also check out the Guidelines on the welcome template, so you will be aware of [[90/10]] (which some here seem to have a problem with) and citing sources. Thanks!--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 20:49, 28 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:49, September 29, 2011
Welcome!
Hello, TennaK, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, TennaK!
Sorry about the hasty block! I just saw a revert reason for your contribution and read the diff wrong apparently, but you have been restored now. Please enjoy editing. Sorry!!--James Wilson 20:28, 28 September 2011 (EDT)
- I didn't even notice until you said something here! My earlier edit wasn't parody, I'll find some resources to back it up. --TennaK 20:41, 28 September 2011 (EDT)
- Please do. Those pages seem to be hotbeds for parody and heated discussion among other things, based on my experiences here. Also check out the Guidelines on the welcome template, so you will be aware of 90/10 (which some here seem to have a problem with) and citing sources. Thanks!--James Wilson 20:49, 28 September 2011 (EDT)