Difference between revisions of "Taylor v. Anderson"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Julia (talk) to last revision by DanielPulido) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | In '''''Taylor v. Anderson''''', 234 U.S. 74, 75-76 (1914), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that a federal claim may properly establish jurisdiction only when "unaided by anything alleged or in anticipation or avoidance of defenses which it is thought the defendant may interpose." <ref>http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=234&invol=74</ref> | |
The case concerned a dispute arising from repossession of property. The decision was unanimous. | The case concerned a dispute arising from repossession of property. The decision was unanimous. | ||
Revision as of 06:48, October 16, 2011
In Taylor v. Anderson, 234 U.S. 74, 75-76 (1914), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a federal claim may properly establish jurisdiction only when "unaided by anything alleged or in anticipation or avoidance of defenses which it is thought the defendant may interpose." [1]
The case concerned a dispute arising from repossession of property. The decision was unanimous.