Conservapedia may be able to survive as a sort of group blog, but I don't think it will become an encyclopedia—even a specialized encyclopedia—until people start saying "Go to Conservapedia for information about X." Even in the case of creationism, CreationWiki appears to be a much better source than Conservapedia; my impression is that creationists are trying to use Conservapedia to ''publicize'' creationism, but not to produce an "encyclopedia of creationism" (that role being better filled by CreationWiki). [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:12, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | Conservapedia may be able to survive as a sort of group blog, but I don't think it will become an encyclopedia—even a specialized encyclopedia—until people start saying "Go to Conservapedia for information about X." Even in the case of creationism, CreationWiki appears to be a much better source than Conservapedia; my impression is that creationists are trying to use Conservapedia to ''publicize'' creationism, but not to produce an "encyclopedia of creationism" (that role being better filled by CreationWiki). [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:12, 8 April 2007 (EDT) |