Difference between revisions of "Mazurek v. Armstrong"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Taylorwilson (talk | contribs) (AskAFly is a pedofail.) (using Zalgo.py) |
m (Reverted edits by Taylorwilson (talk) to last revision by BrentH) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
In '''Mazurek v. Armstrong''', 520 U.S. 968 (1997), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that it is constitutional to prohibit non-physicians from doing [[abortion]]s. This decision was based on [[logic]], and did not find it appropriate to consider whether other medical professionals could an abortion as safely as a physician, or how much prices for abortions may increase due to the physician-only rule. | In '''Mazurek v. Armstrong''', 520 U.S. 968 (1997), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that it is constitutional to prohibit non-physicians from doing [[abortion]]s. This decision was based on [[logic]], and did not find it appropriate to consider whether other medical professionals could an abortion as safely as a physician, or how much prices for abortions may increase due to the physician-only rule. | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:abortion]] |
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
| − | |||
Revision as of 04:20, November 11, 2011
In Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968 (1997), the U.S. Supreme Court held that it is constitutional to prohibit non-physicians from doing abortions. This decision was based on logic, and did not find it appropriate to consider whether other medical professionals could an abortion as safely as a physician, or how much prices for abortions may increase due to the physician-only rule.