Difference between revisions of "Debate:Why the Bible"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Agreed. I think it was made by some men wanting to show people morals and values, like Aesop fables. | Agreed. I think it was made by some men wanting to show people morals and values, like Aesop fables. | ||
| + | |||
| + | While some Biblical events may be confirmable by more scientific-based types of knowledge, belief in most of the Bible is contingent on faith. Nothing more, nothing less. Take that for what it's worth. [[User:Jacobin|Jacobin]] 19:44, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:44, April 8, 2007
Nothing
There is no evidence that the Bible is more trustworthy than any other piece of literature. The Bible is merely a fictional novel which has traditionally been believed and baselessly seen as the infallible word of God for hundreds of generations. -Helios
Agreed. I think it was made by some men wanting to show people morals and values, like Aesop fables.
While some Biblical events may be confirmable by more scientific-based types of knowledge, belief in most of the Bible is contingent on faith. Nothing more, nothing less. Take that for what it's worth. Jacobin 19:44, 8 April 2007 (EDT)