Difference between revisions of "Talk:Simple eye"
From Conservapedia
m (Spelling) |
m (→Nominate for deletion: a note to SamRSC) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I agree. If you add it as a subsection to the eye article, I will delete these pages. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 15:37, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | :I agree. If you add it as a subsection to the eye article, I will delete these pages. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 15:37, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Deal. -[[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 15:48, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Nominate for deletion == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This "article" is just rubbish. Never mind merging it; it should be deleted, because it's simply wrong. A simple eye is NOT an eye which has just one lens; vertebrate eyes have one lens, and are far from simple. --[[User:SamRSC|SamRSC]] 19:40, 25 November 2011 (EST) | ||
| + | :Simple dosn't refer to the complexity of the eye, it refers to the number of lenses. [[User:FCapra|FCapra]] 19:53, 25 November 2011 (EST) | ||
| + | ::SamRSC, you sure do like to bash articles and users. It would be nice if you just stick to the point. Follow Thumper's mother's advice: "If you don't have anything nice to say, then don't say it at all." [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 20:17, 25 November 2011 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:17, November 26, 2011
This really doesn't warrant its own page, and would be much better off as a subsection of eye. -DrSandstone 15:21, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
- I agree. If you add it as a subsection to the eye article, I will delete these pages. --DeanStalk 15:37, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
- Deal. -DrSandstone 15:48, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
Nominate for deletion
This "article" is just rubbish. Never mind merging it; it should be deleted, because it's simply wrong. A simple eye is NOT an eye which has just one lens; vertebrate eyes have one lens, and are far from simple. --SamRSC 19:40, 25 November 2011 (EST)
- Simple dosn't refer to the complexity of the eye, it refers to the number of lenses. FCapra 19:53, 25 November 2011 (EST)
