Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pharyngula (blog)"
("indicating that PZ Myers' bog posts often lack substance") |
(→Grammar fix) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Should read "blog," not "bog." Article is locked, or I'd fix it myself. [[User:MartinC|MartinC]] 22:30, 18 August 2010 (EDT) | Should read "blog," not "bog." Article is locked, or I'd fix it myself. [[User:MartinC|MartinC]] 22:30, 18 August 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Reference 2== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should perhaps link to [http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/07/pharyngula_on_strike.php this post] which contains the quote rather than the front page. [[User:DrewJ|DrewJ]] 14:37, 23 August 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Grammar fix == | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the sentence "Pharyngula is widely acclaimed in the liberal media which is due to its embrace of evolutionary pseudoscience which liberals irrationally embrace (see: Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality)." please remove the words "which is" since they do not belong there at all. I would do it but the page is locked. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 00:27, 29 November 2011 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, is the blog really acclaimed by the liberal media? I cannot say that I've ever heard of it until today. It may be acclaimed in some places, by some people, but not in any mainstream media as far as I'm aware. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 11:57, 29 November 2011 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:57, November 29, 2011
"indicating that PZ Myers' bog posts often lack substance"
Should read "blog," not "bog." Article is locked, or I'd fix it myself. MartinC 22:30, 18 August 2010 (EDT)
Reference 2
Should perhaps link to this post which contains the quote rather than the front page. DrewJ 14:37, 23 August 2010 (EDT)
Grammar fix
In the sentence "Pharyngula is widely acclaimed in the liberal media which is due to its embrace of evolutionary pseudoscience which liberals irrationally embrace (see: Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality)." please remove the words "which is" since they do not belong there at all. I would do it but the page is locked. Ayzmo :) 00:27, 29 November 2011 (EST)
Also, is the blog really acclaimed by the liberal media? I cannot say that I've ever heard of it until today. It may be acclaimed in some places, by some people, but not in any mainstream media as far as I'm aware. Ayzmo :) 11:57, 29 November 2011 (EST)
