Difference between revisions of "Talk:North Korea"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
According to what can we rank the severity of dictatorships? Why is it North Korea and not, for example, [[Turkmenistan|Türkmenistan]]? The latter is not a bad candidate for rank #1. [[User:Sporean|Sporean]] 09:41, 8 April 2010 (EDT)
 
According to what can we rank the severity of dictatorships? Why is it North Korea and not, for example, [[Turkmenistan|Türkmenistan]]? The latter is not a bad candidate for rank #1. [[User:Sporean|Sporean]] 09:41, 8 April 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
== The old leader is dead ==
 +
 +
Did you hear that Kim Jong-il died? He died December 17 2011 while boarding a train

Revision as of 15:51, December 23, 2011

Rhetoric is verging on silly - or already there. This is a serious article about people in serious trouble:

styles itself ...
megalomaniacal dictator
criticized by people of all political stripes ...
difficulties with food shortages

First two are overblown rhetoric.

Next one is an exaggeration; liberals hardly ever criticize the NK government.

Last one is an understatement.

Please rewrite the intro with a more serious tone. Save breezy for record album reviews. --Ed Poor Talk 23:01, 6 July 2007 (EDT)

Defense

Outdated air force is right! That must be the last country on the planet to still have MiG-17s in operational service.--Frey 14:09, 11 October 2008 (EDT)

Most severe dictatorship?

According to what can we rank the severity of dictatorships? Why is it North Korea and not, for example, Türkmenistan? The latter is not a bad candidate for rank #1. Sporean 09:41, 8 April 2010 (EDT)

The old leader is dead

Did you hear that Kim Jong-il died? He died December 17 2011 while boarding a train