I think we got this, thanks. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 15:45, 29 November 2009 (EST)
I think we got this, thanks. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 15:45, 29 November 2009 (EST)
+
+
::Well personally, I think TK's solution may be the best to go with. Spitting the POV on the origins of the Milky Way into "seperate but equal presentations". I can write what I accept as the age of the galaxy based on the research and papers I found, and you can write a YEC POV on the age of the galaxy using the sites and material you located. I am perfectly willing to go with his proposal as a good compromise and solution. It certainly beats tossing the section (which wasn't out of censorship but out of preventing a long drawn out, pointless edit war as it seems things we are not agreeing enough) What say you?
+
+
I imagine it would look something like this...
+
:'''Age of Milky Way''' - Main section name
+
::Secular - OEC Point of View (My info that I originally wrote) - subsection
+
::YEC Point of View (The materiel you want, plus perhaps TrondE site also) -subsection
+
+
--[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 15:58, 29 November 2009 (EST)
+
+
:::That works fine for me, but I would need a stipulation - no addressing the other PoV in our sections. That includes using terms like "mainstream scientists" or something, which imply that the opposition is less valid. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 16:04, 29 November 2009 (EST)
+
+
::::That works for me, I will set up the sections and place in my info for the "Secular - OEC Point of View" and make a blank section for the "YEC Point of View" and leave it empty, I will leave it up to you to fill it with your YEC viewpoint as you deem fit. We good? --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 16:14, 29 November 2009 (EST)