Difference between revisions of "Talk:Writing Signups"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
==Question==
 
==Question==
 
This sounds quite promising. Could you give examples what you judge as good ''persuasive writing''? At best some articles here at Conservapedia? [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:36, 3 January 2012 (EST)
 
This sounds quite promising. Could you give examples what you judge as good ''persuasive writing''? At best some articles here at Conservapedia? [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:36, 3 January 2012 (EST)
 +
:Certainly. Anything starting with "Atheism and..." That's ''very'' persuasive. It certainly persuaded me that Ken is an obnoxious dolt, and looking around the internet it seems I'm not the only one. --[[User:DougAdams|DougAdams]] 08:48, 3 January 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 13:48, January 3, 2012

Course Description?

I'm interested in the course, but am unsure whether I will have the time and whether I am over/under qualified. Could someone perhaps say a bit more about what the course will cover and what will be expected of the students? Will it be along the lines of the World History Lectures?--JustinD 02:09, 3 January 2012 (EST)

I'm interested also but I'd like a bit more information on the content/format if possible. many thanks NicosB 02:24, 3 January 2012 (EST)


Question

This sounds quite promising. Could you give examples what you judge as good persuasive writing? At best some articles here at Conservapedia? AugustO 02:36, 3 January 2012 (EST)

Certainly. Anything starting with "Atheism and..." That's very persuasive. It certainly persuaded me that Ken is an obnoxious dolt, and looking around the internet it seems I'm not the only one. --DougAdams 08:48, 3 January 2012 (EST)