Difference between revisions of "Talk:Writing Signups"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by DougAdams (talk) to last revision by AugustO)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
==Question==
 
==Question==
 
This sounds quite promising. Could you give examples what you judge as good ''persuasive writing''? At best some articles here at Conservapedia? [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:36, 3 January 2012 (EST)
 
This sounds quite promising. Could you give examples what you judge as good ''persuasive writing''? At best some articles here at Conservapedia? [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:36, 3 January 2012 (EST)
−
:Certainly. Anything starting with "Atheism and..." That's ''very'' persuasive. It certainly persuaded me that Ken is an obnoxious dolt, and looking around the internet it seems I'm not the only one. --[[User:DougAdams|DougAdams]] 08:48, 3 January 2012 (EST)
 

Revision as of 14:28, January 3, 2012

Course Description?

I'm interested in the course, but am unsure whether I will have the time and whether I am over/under qualified. Could someone perhaps say a bit more about what the course will cover and what will be expected of the students? Will it be along the lines of the World History Lectures?--JustinD 02:09, 3 January 2012 (EST)

I'm interested also but I'd like a bit more information on the content/format if possible. many thanks NicosB 02:24, 3 January 2012 (EST)


Question

This sounds quite promising. Could you give examples what you judge as good persuasive writing? At best some articles here at Conservapedia? AugustO 02:36, 3 January 2012 (EST)