Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jpatt"

Revision as of 21:17, January 6, 2012

Archive 2008

Here

Archive 2009

[1]

Archive 2010

[2]

Archive 2011

[3]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==
+== Archive 2008 ==
+[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/Subway_Troll Here]
-We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!
-We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock.
-Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!
-We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.
-May the gods bless your ignorance,
-Your servant,
-JsEsNsSeEsN
-p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better!
-== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==
-We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!
-We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock.
-Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!
-We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.
-May the gods bless your ignorance,
-Your servant,
-JsEsNsSeEsN
-p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.
-== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==
-We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!
-We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock.
-Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!
-We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.
-May the gods bless your ignorance,
-Your servant,
-JsEsNsSeEsN
-p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.
-== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==
-We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!
-We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock.
-Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!
-We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.
-May the gods bless your ignorance,
-Your servant,
-JsEsNsSeEsN
-p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.
-== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==
-We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!
-We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock.
-Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!
-We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.
-May the gods bless your ignorance,
-Your servant,
-JsEsNsSeEsN
-p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.
 == Archive 2009 ==

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jpatt"

Revision as of 21:17, January 6, 2012

Contents

Archive 2008

Archive 2009

Archive 2010

Archive 2011

Navigation menu

Search