Difference between revisions of "David Allen Green"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (cats) |
(combine the common refs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''David Allen Green''' is a British lawyer and writer as well as a | + | '''David Allen Green''' is a British lawyer and writer as well as a legal correspondent for the ''New Statesman'' and the blog as "Jack of Kent". Green is a [[Philosophical skepticism|skeptic]] who helps run Westminster Skeptics.<ref name="DAF06July2011">[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Statesman - 06 July 2011]</ref> |
== Commentary on Richard Dawkins == | == Commentary on Richard Dawkins == | ||
| + | Commenting on [[Elevatorgate]], a scandal involving [[Richard Dawkins]], Green said he believed Dawkins was a [[sexism|sexist]].<ref name="DAF06July2011"/> In addition, Green wrote: "Can Richard Dawkins still credibly pose as a champion of rational thinking and an evidence-based approach? In my opinion, he certainly cannot, at least not in the way he did before."<ref name="DAF06July2011"/> | ||
| − | + | ==See also== | |
| − | |||
| − | See also | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*[[Women's views of Richard Dawkins]] | *[[Women's views of Richard Dawkins]] | ||
*[[Atheism and women]] | *[[Atheism and women]] | ||
| Line 13: | Line 10: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| − | {{reflist | + | {{reflist}} |
| + | |||
| + | {{DEFAULTSORT:Green, David Allen}} | ||
[[Category: Lawyers]] | [[Category: Lawyers]] | ||
[[Category: British Lawyers]] | [[Category: British Lawyers]] | ||
[[Category: British Writers]] | [[Category: British Writers]] | ||
Revision as of 12:54, January 11, 2012
David Allen Green is a British lawyer and writer as well as a legal correspondent for the New Statesman and the blog as "Jack of Kent". Green is a skeptic who helps run Westminster Skeptics.[1]
Commentary on Richard Dawkins
Commenting on Elevatorgate, a scandal involving Richard Dawkins, Green said he believed Dawkins was a sexist.[1] In addition, Green wrote: "Can Richard Dawkins still credibly pose as a champion of rational thinking and an evidence-based approach? In my opinion, he certainly cannot, at least not in the way he did before."[1]