Difference between revisions of "User talk:Everrest"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JamesWilson (talk | contribs) (reply) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::::::It's common parlance, there arent really "sources" for commonly used terms. I'll look and see what I can find. --[[User:Everrest|Everrest]] 16:20, 12 January 2012 (EST) | ::::::It's common parlance, there arent really "sources" for commonly used terms. I'll look and see what I can find. --[[User:Everrest|Everrest]] 16:20, 12 January 2012 (EST) | ||
:::::::I found something else. What do you think?--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 16:31, 12 January 2012 (EST) | :::::::I found something else. What do you think?--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 16:31, 12 January 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | ::::::::It communicates the meaning but I wanted to stay away from websites like that because they arent terribly reliable. Single-person self-published websites arent the greatest source. --[[User:Everrest|Everrest]] 18:35, 12 January 2012 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:35, January 12, 2012
Please do not insert nonsense into pages. If you do so again, you will be banned.--James Wilson 16:04, 12 January 2012 (EST)
Nonsense such as? --Everrest 16:05, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- "fluffy bunny". This is not Wikipedia. We do not take lightly to such childish nonsense.--James Wilson 16:06, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- It's a term used within the Pagan/Wiccan community to describe someone who isnt serious about their identification as a Pagan or Wiccan, someone who identifies for shock value without understanding what they're singing up for. It's a perfectly valid and widely used term. --Everrest 16:08, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- If that is so, feel free to reinsert the material and add a citation.--James Wilson 16:10, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- Done --Everrest 16:14, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- OK, but I would find a more reputable source than UrbanDictionary. It's full of lies and vulgarities, including definitions of crude terms and unsubstantiated criticisms of President George W. Bush. Plus it's not family friendly, as per Conservapedia:Commandments. Thanks.--James Wilson 16:17, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- It's common parlance, there arent really "sources" for commonly used terms. I'll look and see what I can find. --Everrest 16:20, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- I found something else. What do you think?--James Wilson 16:31, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- It communicates the meaning but I wanted to stay away from websites like that because they arent terribly reliable. Single-person self-published websites arent the greatest source. --Everrest 18:35, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- I found something else. What do you think?--James Wilson 16:31, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- It's common parlance, there arent really "sources" for commonly used terms. I'll look and see what I can find. --Everrest 16:20, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- OK, but I would find a more reputable source than UrbanDictionary. It's full of lies and vulgarities, including definitions of crude terms and unsubstantiated criticisms of President George W. Bush. Plus it's not family friendly, as per Conservapedia:Commandments. Thanks.--James Wilson 16:17, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- Done --Everrest 16:14, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- If that is so, feel free to reinsert the material and add a citation.--James Wilson 16:10, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- It's a term used within the Pagan/Wiccan community to describe someone who isnt serious about their identification as a Pagan or Wiccan, someone who identifies for shock value without understanding what they're singing up for. It's a perfectly valid and widely used term. --Everrest 16:08, 12 January 2012 (EST)