19,576
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 11:
Line 11: − + + + + + + + + + + +
Reverted edits by Tilejoin (talk) to last revision by Adambro
:I'd therefore be grateful if you could explain exactly what "troublesome editing" or apparent edit warring you are referring to that I should discontinue. [[User:Adambro|Adambro]] 07:59, 11 January 2012 (EST)
:I'd therefore be grateful if you could explain exactly what "troublesome editing" or apparent edit warring you are referring to that I should discontinue. [[User:Adambro|Adambro]] 07:59, 11 January 2012 (EST)
----
::I believe he meant talking back, and questioning our goal. In either case, here is the helpful links again.
::I believe he meant talking back, and questioning our goal. In either case, here is the helpful links again.
{{warning}}
{{warning}}
[[User:JonM|JonM]] 12:55, 11 January 2012 (EST)
[[User:JonM|JonM]] 12:55, 11 January 2012 (EST)
:Well I have those links just above so that isn't too helpful. Perhaps you could advise what the correct way of resolving disagreements regarding content is then if it isn't to discuss those issues? I'd also be grateful if you could point out any examples where I've been "questioning our goal". [[User:Adambro|Adambro]] 13:09, 11 January 2012 (EST)
::A quick look at your contributions list shows that the entirety of your activities on this site have been small edits adding liberal POV to articles you don't agree with, punctuated with reverting a bunch of vandalism by what looks like the same vandal/sockpuppet. Tell me, Adam, why is it that every time a vandal shows up with a name like BU99ERY or something similar, you're there to revert the vandalism only a minute later? I've gone through your contribution logs and the pattern is obvious. You're trying to raise your edit count by making minor edits to articles without adding content, and you either are or are cooperating with a vandal who is repeatedly vandalizing this site, only for you to swoop in a minute later to "save" us. You are an obvious fraud and I will not allow you to compromise this project. [[User:TonyPark|TonyPark]] 16:19, 11 January 2012 (EST)
:::[[Correlation is not causation]]... But seriously, it isn't too hard to spot vandalism using [[Special:RecentChanges]]. It's even easier when the vandal involved edits my own talk page resulting in me seeing the "you have new messages" thing. I'll admit though that as, like you, I haven't been here very long, dealing with vandalism is an easy and obvious way to help out. Learning the ropes as to actually writing and editing articles is harder and I fully expect to make some mistakes along the way. I do hope that we can deal with any of what may be those mistakes in a sensible manner however. [[User:Adambro|Adambro]] 18:12, 11 January 2012 (EST)
==Unblocked==
I unblocked you but I believe your contributions will be monitored so try to be careful !--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 16:38, 11 January 2012 (EST)
==Blocking Rights==
Congrats on your promotion. I think I was rashful in my judgement, please accept my apologies.[[User:JonM|JonM]] 21:00, 11 January 2012 (EST)