Difference between revisions of "Talk:Zach Johnson"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:: The point of an ecylopedia is not that something is "self-evident" but that well-sourced reference can be made for a claim. --[[User:Cgday|Cgday]] 16:43, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | :: The point of an ecylopedia is not that something is "self-evident" but that well-sourced reference can be made for a claim. --[[User:Cgday|Cgday]] 16:43, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *So, you can talk, but cannot look, and find the source? You like to edit, but not "do"? Or are you perhaps just a "concerned" citizen being vigilant? --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 16:47, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:47, April 9, 2007
Prominent?
He is prominent among a new generation of Christian athletes - Where is this information from? Who else is on this list of prominent Christian athletes? Seems like an opinion/gossip line to me. Jrssr5 15:37, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
Well, it doesn't to me, or to Andy. He is the winner of the Masters, therefore he is prominent. --~ TK MyTalk 15:53, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
How is it evidence of a "new generation"? There is nothing in the link to support that claim. --Cgday 16:40, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
- It certainly shows that the idea of a new generation of Christian athletes exists.
- WhatIsG0ing0n 16:41, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
- :: it shows a individual has faith - it's says nothing at all about a generational trend. --Cgday 16:43, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
- Well, I am sorry if you don't agree about what is self-evident. --~ TK MyTalk 16:42, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
- The point of an ecylopedia is not that something is "self-evident" but that well-sourced reference can be made for a claim. --Cgday 16:43, 9 April 2007 (EDT)