Difference between revisions of "User talk:GeorgeLi"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Useful links
DamianJohn (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by StarkNaked (talk) to last revision by Joaquín Martínez) |
DamianJohn (talk | contribs) (→United Kingdom: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{welcome|sig=[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 08:51, 2 February 2012 (EST)}} | {{welcome|sig=[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 08:51, 2 February 2012 (EST)}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == United Kingdom == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I sympathise with your position, I really do, but the fact remains that the underdogs claim is sufficiently referenced to the Conservapedia standard for referencing. Unfortunately, the onus is on you to show if there are any exceptions to the accepted principle. Good luck. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 17:58, 7 February 2012 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 22:58, February 7, 2012
Welcome!
Hello, GeorgeLi, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, GeorgeLi!
- Joaquín Martínez 08:51, 2 February 2012 (EST)
United Kingdom
I sympathise with your position, I really do, but the fact remains that the underdogs claim is sufficiently referenced to the Conservapedia standard for referencing. Unfortunately, the onus is on you to show if there are any exceptions to the accepted principle. Good luck. --DamianJohn 17:58, 7 February 2012 (EST)