46
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: − + + + +
no edit summary
:JonM suggests that the content on Wikipedia was copied from "the website of vancouver" but it's not even a month since this was added and the link to the Vancouver website doesn't seem to work and I can't find the content anywhere on the website. Even if this was on the Vancouver website, what would be the copyright situation there? It doesn't look like it's in the public domain. [[User:Adambro|Adambro]] 15:16, 15 January 2012 (EST)
:JonM suggests that the content on Wikipedia was copied from "the website of vancouver" but it's not even a month since this was added and the link to the Vancouver website doesn't seem to work and I can't find the content anywhere on the website. Even if this was on the Vancouver website, what would be the copyright situation there? It doesn't look like it's in the public domain. [[User:Adambro|Adambro]] 15:16, 15 January 2012 (EST)
::It's a civic website, I think it's fine. If not, revert me.15:26, 15 January 2012 (EST)
::It's a civic website, I think it's fine. If not, revert me.[[User:JonM|JonM]] 15:26, 15 January 2012 (EST)
:::Well I wasn't sure exactly since I couldn't find the precise source to be sure about the copyright situation. [[User:Adambro|Adambro]] 15:28, 15 January 2012 (EST)
::::K, revert me. I'll write up something to replace it when I have the time... :)[[User:JonM|JonM]] 15:47, 15 January 2012 (EST)
:Since no on seems to have gotten to it, i suppose its good, plagiarizing and all?[[User:SusanP|SusanP]] 23:23, 9 February 2012 (EST)