Difference between revisions of "Talk:Saturday Night Live"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Always forget the reference tag.) |
JamesWilson (talk | contribs) (reply) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| + | :SNL has lessened in quality in recent years. Actors on the show are much more likely to parody conservative politicians rather than liberal ones.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 20:48, 19 February 2012 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 01:48, February 20, 2012
Popularity/Humor
I'm not sure I agree with a lot of the first section. SNL is still a very highly rated show and was the highest rated show in the 18-49 demographic for Saturday nights in 2011. While the numbers change every week SNL has consistently been competing only with itself.[1] There's also the issue that humor is very subjective but I think we can generally go by what the most people think. In this case the ratings imply that SNL is still very funny. Ayzmo :) 20:09, 19 February 2012 (EST)
- SNL has lessened in quality in recent years. Actors on the show are much more likely to parody conservative politicians rather than liberal ones.--James Wilson 20:48, 19 February 2012 (EST)