Difference between revisions of "Talk:Druidry"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
:I'm not sure I understand your reasoning. Julius Caesar ''is'' the evidence. [[User:Dorpfeld|Dorpfeld]] 08:02, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:I'm not sure I understand your reasoning. Julius Caesar ''is'' the evidence. [[User:Dorpfeld|Dorpfeld]] 08:02, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Julius Caeser said that it happened, that does not necessarily mean that it did! If such a practice did occur, then surely there would be some other reference to it by somebody else? There is no such other reference. I imagine that the idea of burning people in a Wicker Man was probably inspired by the film! [[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 08:06, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:06, April 10, 2007

The following phrase from the article looks a bit doubtful to me: "Druidic training was very hard, and involved being placed under a heavy rock in a river for 20 years whilst learning by heart thousands of lines of poetry and song."--British_cons (talk) 06:03, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

I removed the statement about human sacrifice in Wicker Men. The only mention of this is by Julius Caeser and there is a distinct lack of corroborating evidence. MatteeNeutra 07:09, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

I'm not sure I understand your reasoning. Julius Caesar is the evidence. Dorpfeld 08:02, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
Julius Caeser said that it happened, that does not necessarily mean that it did! If such a practice did occur, then surely there would be some other reference to it by somebody else? There is no such other reference. I imagine that the idea of burning people in a Wicker Man was probably inspired by the film! MatteeNeutra 08:06, 10 April 2007 (EDT)