Difference between revisions of "Talk:October Baby"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(beg to differ....) |
m |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Aschlafly, I had read the article in the NY Times, but IMO it doesn't back up the statement that liberals admit that it is a ''top-rate movie'': Should I have labeled my edit '''''trim''''' or '''''clean-up''''' as you do when you are [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=E%3Dmc%C2%B2&diff=971442&oldid=971352 deleting material]? | Aschlafly, I had read the article in the NY Times, but IMO it doesn't back up the statement that liberals admit that it is a ''top-rate movie'': Should I have labeled my edit '''''trim''''' or '''''clean-up''''' as you do when you are [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=E%3Dmc%C2%B2&diff=971442&oldid=971352 deleting material]? | ||
| − | 11: | + | [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:26, 4 April 2012 (EDT) |
Revision as of 15:26, April 4, 2012
Top-rate
- More slickly packaged than most faith-based fare, “October Baby” gussies up its anti-abortion message with gauzy cinematography and more emo music than an entire season of “Grey’s Anatomy.”
- “October Baby” traffics primarily in soapy melodrama and false compassion.
Frankly, that doesn't sound like top-rate to me.
(added reference; note that deletions are disfavored on this site, and references should be sought before deleting material)
Aschlafly, I had read the article in the NY Times, but IMO it doesn't back up the statement that liberals admit that it is a top-rate movie: Should I have labeled my edit trim or clean-up as you do when you are deleting material?
AugustO 11:26, 4 April 2012 (EDT)