Difference between revisions of "User talk:Zimbardo Cookie Experiment"
From Conservapedia
(re. evolution) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
is that for me or for others? [[User:Airdish|Airdish]] 10:11, 10 April 2007 (EDT) | is that for me or for others? [[User:Airdish|Airdish]] 10:11, 10 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : It was a response to Scorpion; hard to indicate that sometimes with the indentation. [[User:Zimbardo Cookie Experiment|Zimbardo Cookie Experiment]] 10:35, 10 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:35, April 10, 2007
Don't delete so much information. Let the reader decide.
If you think the reference to Pontius Pilate is not exactly right, then modify it. Don't delete it. This is not Wikipedia, where I feel censorship is rampant.
Thanks.--Aschlafly 02:48, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
- My attempt wasn't to censor that information (if it had appeared in the Pontius Pilate article, for example, I would have simply modified it) but to delete what I perceived as an irrelevant fact. The historicity of Jesus is a very complicated issue, as is the historicity of the Bible, and I'm not sure the Jesus article is well-served by arguments about the accuracy of the gospels. In any case, I will try to use a lighter touch in the future; hope I did not offend. Zimbardo Cookie Experiment 14:42, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
re. evolution
is that for me or for others? Airdish 10:11, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
- It was a response to Scorpion; hard to indicate that sometimes with the indentation. Zimbardo Cookie Experiment 10:35, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
