Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conservative Party (UK)"
(guns) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
As a British person living in the US, I can only say that the two last paragraphs of the first section of this article certainly don't represent matters the way most British people would see it. [[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 22:08 9 April 2007 (EDT) | As a British person living in the US, I can only say that the two last paragraphs of the first section of this article certainly don't represent matters the way most British people would see it. [[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 22:08 9 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == guns == | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''It also benefit from a much-publicized slaughter in Scotland of 16 children and a teacher in 1996 by Thomas Hamilton, who used four handguns and several hundred rounds of ammunition. Gun control was enacted afterwards and the entire United Kingdom, horrified by the massacre, moved to the left politically.'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is just - well nonsense, this has never been mentioned as a significant fact by any serious politician commentatory. --[[User:Cgday|Cgday]] 12:34, 10 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:34, April 10, 2007
Aren't there any disambiguation pages on Conservapedia??? --Redblue 08:45, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
does this have any factual basis?
As a British person living in the US, I can only say that the two last paragraphs of the first section of this article certainly don't represent matters the way most British people would see it. Britinme 22:08 9 April 2007 (EDT)
guns
It also benefit from a much-publicized slaughter in Scotland of 16 children and a teacher in 1996 by Thomas Hamilton, who used four handguns and several hundred rounds of ammunition. Gun control was enacted afterwards and the entire United Kingdom, horrified by the massacre, moved to the left politically.
This is just - well nonsense, this has never been mentioned as a significant fact by any serious politician commentatory. --Cgday 12:34, 10 April 2007 (EDT)