Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + + +
The Equal Protection Clause is invoked by abortion clinics to try to invalidate laws that treat them differently than legitimate medical services.
Recently, the Equal Protection Clause has been interpreted in a broader manner than before. For example, in [[Kansas]], multiple lawsuits have been resolved in favor of claimants who have argued that the public school funding system discriminates against students in counties with smaller tax bases, and judges have ordered wealthier school districts to share money with other districts.
Recently, the Equal Protection Clause has been interpreted in a broader manner than before. For example, in [[Kansas]], multiple lawsuits have been resolved in favor of claimants who have argued that the public school funding system discriminates against students in counties with smaller tax bases, and judges have ordered wealthier school districts to share money with other districts.
== Use in abortion cases ==
The Equal Protection Clause is invoked by [[abortion]] clinics to try to invalidate laws that treat them differently than legitimate medical services.
[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Equal Protection Clause]]
[[Category:Equal Protection Clause]]
[[Category:abortion legal arguments]]