Difference between revisions of "Talk:Double-slit experiment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Thanks) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Thanks. --[[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]<sup>([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])</sup> 22:24, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | :Thanks. --[[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]<sup>([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])</sup> 22:24, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == This simple experiment demonstrates that the wave-particle duality of light. == | ||
| + | |||
| + | No, it doesn't. The observed patterns are illuminating the wave character of light and if you use only one slit, you see a ''diffraction pattern'', which can't be by particles. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 12:06, 6 May 2012 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:06, May 6, 2012
Ill try to help if i can...--PalMDtalk 23:00, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
- Thanks. --Liπus the Turbogeek(contact me) 22:24, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
This simple experiment demonstrates that the wave-particle duality of light.
No, it doesn't. The observed patterns are illuminating the wave character of light and if you use only one slit, you see a diffraction pattern, which can't be by particles.
--AugustO 12:06, 6 May 2012 (EDT)