Difference between revisions of "Talk:Double-slit experiment"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
== This simple experiment demonstrates that the wave-particle duality of light. ==
 
== This simple experiment demonstrates that the wave-particle duality of light. ==
  
−
No, it doesn't. The observed patterns are illuminating the wave character of light and if you use only one slit, you see a ''diffraction pattern'', which can't be by particles.
+
No, it doesn't. The observed patterns are illuminating the wave character of light and if you use only one slit, you see a ''[[diffraction|diffraction pattern]]'', which can't be by particles.
  
 
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 12:06, 6 May 2012 (EDT)
 
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 12:06, 6 May 2012 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:28, May 6, 2012

Ill try to help if i can...--PalMDtalk 23:00, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

Thanks. --Liπus the Turbogeek(contact me) 22:24, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

This simple experiment demonstrates that the wave-particle duality of light.

No, it doesn't. The observed patterns are illuminating the wave character of light and if you use only one slit, you see a diffraction pattern, which can't be by particles.

--AugustO 12:06, 6 May 2012 (EDT)