| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | + | Archive: |
| | + | [[/1|01]] |
| | + | [[/2|02]] |
| | | | |
| | == PAL == | | == PAL == |
| Line 352: |
Line 355: |
| | Still "puzzled?" --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 16:27, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | | Still "puzzled?" --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 16:27, 9 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| − | One final suggestion Ed, since I don't plan to collaborate with you on anything in the future: Copy the article to your sandbox, tweak it there, and dump your awesome perfect version back into Conservapedia as a single edit, that way incrementalist eventualist editors like me won't be duped into chiselling away at an article only to have the dang thing protected so a sysop can lock in his version. Protection should only be to prevent edits with hostile intent. [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 09:20, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| − | Ed, I understood that my proposed sections of [[political spectrum]] were posted in the draft version so that people could edit them, and in particular so people could offer definitions. Several hours later nobody has objected in any way to my definition (and PF Fox has added a third reference supporting my def, namely Merriam-Webster). Was I wrong to expect a definition of political spectrum to end up on the political spectrum page? Were you just posting those categories in the talk page to get me off your back? And really, is there anything at all offensive about the criterion I offered?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The political spectrum page, as it stands, mentions some labels... who's called what. But it gives NO reason WHY. That's why I've been asking for (and offering) definitions ever since I started working on that page a couple of days ago. I really hope we could have some more civil and informed discussions on CP if there were some CRITERIA available for saying "that's rightist" or leftist or conservative or liberal etc etc etc. If the only thing the political spectrum page says is who's called what, then the only thing we can do when using political words in CP is... '''name calling'''. --[[User:Redblue|Redblue]] 12:11, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Hi again-- in the vain hope that some day the political spectrum page might define the political spectrum, I added two more definitions I think you might like more (since they are based on your earlier comments on the Talk page). I don't understand why you say definition #2 is 'conservative-centric'... but annnyyyywayyyyyy...
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I put in references to "Ed Poor's high school teacher" and "Somebody called Nolan?" I hope you find that amusing. I guess "Citation required" would be more correct. --[[User:Redblue|Redblue]] 12:30, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| | == Sarcasm bans? == | | == Sarcasm bans? == |
| Line 413: |
Line 408: |
| | ==The non-page formerly known as [[Uniting Church in Australia]]== | | ==The non-page formerly known as [[Uniting Church in Australia]]== |
| | Ed, can you please help me find where to see non- or deleted pages? I ''know'' that I created [[Uniting Church in Australia]] about 2-3 weeks ago. Now, I go back to do some more on it, and it's gone, presumably deleted (as in AFDed.) Yes, I borrowed heavily from the Wikipedia entry; but, I was a significant author (but not 'establish'-er) of the content over there so it is 'mine' and I could borrow from it and 'spin' it a little for this context and be true to both. I will go back in and re-create it; but, that could also be removed if people think I am ''only'' 'borrowing' again. It has taught me to set the "Watch this page" for all situations. Advice, please. [[User:Peter Ellis|Peter Ellis]] 23:54, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | | Ed, can you please help me find where to see non- or deleted pages? I ''know'' that I created [[Uniting Church in Australia]] about 2-3 weeks ago. Now, I go back to do some more on it, and it's gone, presumably deleted (as in AFDed.) Yes, I borrowed heavily from the Wikipedia entry; but, I was a significant author (but not 'establish'-er) of the content over there so it is 'mine' and I could borrow from it and 'spin' it a little for this context and be true to both. I will go back in and re-create it; but, that could also be removed if people think I am ''only'' 'borrowing' again. It has taught me to set the "Watch this page" for all situations. Advice, please. [[User:Peter Ellis|Peter Ellis]] 23:54, 9 April 2007 (EDT) |
| − |
| |
| − | *12:16, 22 March 2007 CPAdmin1 (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Uniting Church in Australia" (copy from WP)
| |
| − | --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 00:11, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Thank you. I have put a message over at CPAdmin1's [[User_talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]. [[User:Peter Ellis|Peter Ellis]] 00:59, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == New Problem ==
| |
| − | Ed, help. [[User:Britinme]], a good conservative, and [[User:Palmd001|me]], not a good conservative, but a good doctor, are working on a very good breast cancer article, and Andy is getting a little feisty. Any help?--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 14:05, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Ed, I know you have a life, but I could really use your help [[Breast cancer|here]].--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 14:27, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Sorry, was catching up with old chums at #wikipedia (the IRC channel). You missed a fascinating debate on Evolution vs. Creationism. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:51, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::I always miss the good stuff.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 15:52, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I always thought of [[User:Britinme]] as fairly conservative, and we collaborated.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 15:55, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :<grin> I was calling YOU the liberal. </grin> You don't mind, do you? I'd hate to have to block my account for name-calling. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:56, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *It, it would be a great help, if instead of going to IRC, you paid attention here, and responded to your emails. I don't think you starting even 200 pages, will be of help, if your intent is ramming agendas down our throats, and communicating only with those who agree with you. Did anyone on IRC disclose their changing channels rather than clear the air? Did anyone there disclose their going to a pass-worded channel to avoid people who disagree with them knowing their obstruction plans? This place will turn out to be a repeat of your Wikipedia experience if you insist on steamrolling. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 15:57, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *#The #conservapedia channel has no password. There is, however, a password-protected SYSOP channel at #conservapedia-sysop (email me or hojimachong for the password)
| |
| − | *#Sorry to be out of touch, but I do have life. I might even go out of town for a week at a time. Go easy on me, will ya? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:10, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Mine is a good one, Doctor, at Eisenhower Medical Center. Thanks anyway for your helpfulness....
| |
| − | Ed, you have been here, posting away, not out of town, or too busy to initiate dozens of new articles. I am trying to go easy, but I am disliking your agenda recently. And I dislike you emailing me one opinion about Maxwell, and stating another on the page. It is as if you are trying to marginalize me, hanging me out to dry. As for the password, I have emailed you, asked you on the phone, remember? It is never forthcoming. That doesn't alter the fact that those "elites" think they have no obligation to meet people half way. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 16:14, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :My opinion is that Maxwell is a creationist. I don't care if he's '''categorized''' that way or not. I leave that decision to you, sir.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :BTW, I just blocked Peter for 1 day.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Sorry about the delay on the password. Please check your email now. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:30, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::*Who is Peter? --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 16:32, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
| |