Conservapedia

Changes

Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 04:53, January 11, 2007

181 bytes added ,  04:53, January 11, 2007
no edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:  
6.  The entry for the Spanish Golden Age does not even tell the reader when it occurred, but makes the doubtful claim that the Spanish Golden Age flourished in Latin America.
 
6.  The entry for the Spanish Golden Age does not even tell the reader when it occurred, but makes the doubtful claim that the Spanish Golden Age flourished in Latin America.
   −
7.  Gossip and vulgarity are pervasive on Wikipedia.  Many entries read like the National Enquirer.  In some ways Wikipedia has even lower standards than the National Enquirer.  Conservapedia avoids gossip and vulgarity, just as a true encyclopedia does.
+
7.  Gossip is pervasive on Wikipedia.  Many entries read like the National Enquirer.  For example, Wikipedia's entry on Nina Totenberg states, "She married H. David Reines, a trauma physician, in 2000. On their honeymoon, he treated her for severe injuries after she was hit by a boat propeller while swimming."  That sounds just like the National Enquirer.  Conservapedia avoids gossip and vulgarity, just as a true encyclopedia does.
    
8.  Edits to include facts against the theory of evolution are almost immediately censored.  On Conservapedia, contributions that fit the above guidelines are respected to the maximum extent possible.
 
8.  Edits to include facts against the theory of evolution are almost immediately censored.  On Conservapedia, contributions that fit the above guidelines are respected to the maximum extent possible.
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,231

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/9834"