SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
432
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 548:
Line 548: + +
Talk:Biblical scientific foreknowledge (view source)
Revision as of 04:48, June 21, 2012
, 04:48, June 21, 2012→Would the Dating of Ice Mummy be accurate?
:::::::Another good point, Mr. Schlafly: an object sealed in an unbroken piece of solid (glacial-grade?) ice for it's entire history is probably the safest archeological find possible, contaminant wise.--ADW
:::::::Another good point, Mr. Schlafly: an object sealed in an unbroken piece of solid (glacial-grade?) ice for it's entire history is probably the safest archeological find possible, contaminant wise.--ADW
:When you refer to the ice mummy, is this the famous one? ie. Ötzi? Because if it is, closer examination of the body has revealed that he actually died of a head injury, and an arrow embedded in his back, not the rain. Other evidence (the blood of three or so individuals other than himself on the corpse and his weapons) indicates that he was killed in warfare, and therefore is totally unrelated to the flood. I'll just double check the sources then, if no one else objects, I'll remove it.[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 00:48, 21 June 2012 (EDT)
== Social Sciences ==
== Social Sciences ==