Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dpbsmith"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Comment posted on talk page for Commandments: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dpbsmith, I reflected further on your criticism, which was well-taken. Accordingly, I have changed the Commandment #4 in response to your criticism as follows: 4. When referencing dates based on the approximate birth of Jesus, you must give appropriate credit for the basis of the date (B.C. or A.D.). "BCE" and "CE" are not acceptable substitutes because they deny the historical basis for the date. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks for your thoughtful contributions to Conservapedia. --Aschlafly 12:33, 20 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Feel free to respond there. Thanks! | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:34, 20 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Much better. Fine, in fact. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 13:43, 20 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
I moved our interesting debate about perpetual motion machines to its own talk page for that entry, in the hope it will enlighten and perhaps spark debate by others. I've marked that page as "Watch" now so I will be notified whenever you post to it. | I moved our interesting debate about perpetual motion machines to its own talk page for that entry, in the hope it will enlighten and perhaps spark debate by others. I've marked that page as "Watch" now so I will be notified whenever you post to it. | ||
Revision as of 02:07, January 12, 2007
Comment posted on talk page for Commandments:
Dpbsmith, I reflected further on your criticism, which was well-taken. Accordingly, I have changed the Commandment #4 in response to your criticism as follows: 4. When referencing dates based on the approximate birth of Jesus, you must give appropriate credit for the basis of the date (B.C. or A.D.). "BCE" and "CE" are not acceptable substitutes because they deny the historical basis for the date.
Thanks for your thoughtful contributions to Conservapedia. --Aschlafly 12:33, 20 December 2006 (EST)
Feel free to respond there. Thanks!
--Aschlafly 12:34, 20 December 2006 (EST)
- Much better. Fine, in fact. Dpbsmith 13:43, 20 December 2006 (EST)
I moved our interesting debate about perpetual motion machines to its own talk page for that entry, in the hope it will enlighten and perhaps spark debate by others. I've marked that page as "Watch" now so I will be notified whenever you post to it.
Thanks. --Aschlafly 19:00, 1 January 2007 (EST)
Your explanation of Bell Laboraties is superb! I worked there in the mid-1980s and became an expert in UNIX there. --Aschlafly 22:15, 1 January 2007 (EST)
Nice image of Phillip Brooks! --Aschlafly 20:08, 6 January 2007 (EST)
- Thanks. Dpbsmith 20:26, 6 January 2007 (EST)