1
edit
Changes
Arguments Against Homosexuality (view source)
Revision as of 22:17, July 2, 2012
, 22:17, July 2, 2012no edit summary
In 2003, the [[Pew Research Center]] stated that in the [[United States]], religious beliefs underpin opposition to [[homosexuality]] according to a study they conducted. <ref>http://pewforum.org/docs/index.php?DocID=37</ref> [[Judeo-Christian]] objections nearly always refer to what the [[Homosexuality and the Bible|Bible states about homosexuality]], which, it is argued, condemns homosexual acts in both [[Old Testament|Old]] and [[New Testament]]s. For example, [[Book of Leviticus|Leviticus]] 18:22 says
In 2003, the [[Pew Research Center]] stated that in the [[United States]], religious beliefs underpin opposition to [[homosexuality]] according to a study they conducted. <ref>http://pewforum.org/docs/index.php?DocID=37</ref> [[Judeo-Christian]] objections nearly always refer to what the [[Homosexuality and the Bible|Bible states about homosexuality]], which, it is argued, condemns homosexual acts in both [[Old Testament|Old]] and [[New Testament]]s. For example, [[Book of Leviticus|Leviticus]] 18:22 says
<blockquote>"A man shall not lie with man as with a woman."</blockquote>
<blockquote>"A man shall not lie with man as with a woman, it is abomination."</blockquote>
Romans 1:26-28: "For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. 28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;"
Some liberals argue that historically, condemnation of those sexual acts was simply based on them being unnatural to procreation, and thus contrary to (a definition of) [[Natural Law|unnatural]], inferring that such condemnation is invalid due to ignorance of sexuality.<ref>http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A7715315</ref>
Some liberals argue that historically, condemnation of those sexual acts was simply based on them being unnatural to procreation, and thus contrary to (a definition of) [[Natural Law|unnatural]], inferring that such condemnation is invalid due to ignorance of sexuality.<ref>http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A7715315</ref>