Difference between revisions of "Icons of Evolution"
From Conservapedia
(merge suggestion) |
FrederickT3 (Talk | contribs) (single quotes enclose double quotes) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{merge|Jonathan Wells}} | {{merge|Jonathan Wells}} | ||
| − | '''''Icons of Evolution''''' is a book by [[Jonathan Wells]] which argues that | + | '''''Icons of Evolution''''' is a book by [[Jonathan Wells]] which argues that 'the best-known “evidences” for Darwin’s theory have been exaggerated, distorted or even faked.'<ref>[[Jonathan Wells]], [http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=bvfHD7zgzLoC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=icons+of+evolution&ots=B_V4AmLvnc&sig=-KgTBNwbAiu8nsFI87DaoDIJdj4 Several Online Chapters of Icons of Evolution]</ref><ref>http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=1180</ref><ref>http://www.iconsofevolution.com/</ref><ref>http://www.discovery.org/articleFiles/PDFs/survivalOfTheFakest.pdf</ref> |
Wells explains his title in the book's introduction: | Wells explains his title in the book's introduction: | ||
Revision as of 18:31, July 15, 2012
It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Jonathan Wells. (Discuss)
Icons of Evolution is a book by Jonathan Wells which argues that 'the best-known “evidences” for Darwin’s theory have been exaggerated, distorted or even faked.'[1][2][3][4]
Wells explains his title in the book's introduction:
These examples are so frequently used as evidence for Darwin's theory that most of them have been called "icons" of evolution. Yet all of them, in one way or another, misrepresent the truth. (p. 7)
External links
- Icons of Evolution – Official website
