Difference between revisions of "Talk:Herodotus"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
:This is actually quite a large and detailed entry, by present standards hereabouts. It needs a bit of work, certainly, but not as much as many. And thousands of important people and things don't yet have an entry at all. Might I enquire if you personally are planning to do anything about this situation? --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 16:55, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:This is actually quite a large and detailed entry, by present standards hereabouts. It needs a bit of work, certainly, but not as much as many. And thousands of important people and things don't yet have an entry at all. Might I enquire if you personally are planning to do anything about this situation? --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 16:55, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
Only if the powers that be at Conservapedia.org are serious about having a complete encyclopedia.
+
Only if the powers that be at Conservapedia.org are serious about having a complete encyclopedia. Is one line plus a quote from the post office sufficient for the "father of history"?

Revision as of 15:42, April 11, 2007

Totally inadequate entry

This is actually quite a large and detailed entry, by present standards hereabouts. It needs a bit of work, certainly, but not as much as many. And thousands of important people and things don't yet have an entry at all. Might I enquire if you personally are planning to do anything about this situation? --Jeremiah4-22 16:55, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

Only if the powers that be at Conservapedia.org are serious about having a complete encyclopedia. Is one line plus a quote from the post office sufficient for the "father of history"?