Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:AFD Homer Simpson"
There are no discussions on this page.
|
|
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ''No intellectual content'' I'd go careful with that. You might end up having to AFD many other articles too. [[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 10:07, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| − | : Since when do encyclopedias only contain "intellectual content"? By definition an encyclopedia contains information on as much as possible --[[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 10:11, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :: That's not accurate. An encyclopedia contains information that is ''within a definable scope''. The definition of that scope is the sole prerogative of its senior editors.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :: [[Wikipedia]] might want to do a page on every silly [[television|TV]] show that has ever released. But at Conservapedia, we have the right to be a tad more selective.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :: Show me that ''The Simpsons'' will be a TV classic, and define for me how you would judge a classic as worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia, and I'll reconsider.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 12:04, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::Can you name another television entertainment show that has been on for 18 seasons? [[User:Sterile|Sterile]] 12:27, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
| |
Latest revision as of 17:37, May 10, 2007