Difference between revisions of "Help talk:How To Create a Conservapedia Account"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(I might be getting impatient because it's getting late, but ...)
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I propose that a new user's first 10 or 20 edits be regarded as a sort of application or portfolio. We can then decide whether to accept them as a volunteer. Or in the case of vandals, saboteurs and time-waster, reject them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 02:05, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
 
I propose that a new user's first 10 or 20 edits be regarded as a sort of application or portfolio. We can then decide whether to accept them as a volunteer. Or in the case of vandals, saboteurs and time-waster, reject them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 02:05, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
I can not see the link at the bottom-left I assumed that you meant in the little box on the left with Main Page at the top was I mistaken?Alien
 +
 +
== Make the username policy more clear ==
 +
 +
I think it should be made clear that the username '''must''' include your real name, as opposed to ''recommending'' your real name; perhaps there could be a help page on Conservapedia's username policy. A few users have been blocked for violating an otherwise nonexistent policy (and also advised to create an account with a real name even though their account creation is disabled for two years). A clear username policy would probably be beneficial for Conservapedia. -- [[User:DanielJackson|DanielJackson]] 10:46, 6 December 2014 (EST)

Latest revision as of 15:46, December 6, 2014

I propose that a new user's first 10 or 20 edits be regarded as a sort of application or portfolio. We can then decide whether to accept them as a volunteer. Or in the case of vandals, saboteurs and time-waster, reject them. --Ed Poor 02:05, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

I can not see the link at the bottom-left I assumed that you meant in the little box on the left with Main Page at the top was I mistaken?Alien

Make the username policy more clear

I think it should be made clear that the username must include your real name, as opposed to recommending your real name; perhaps there could be a help page on Conservapedia's username policy. A few users have been blocked for violating an otherwise nonexistent policy (and also advised to create an account with a real name even though their account creation is disabled for two years). A clear username policy would probably be beneficial for Conservapedia. -- DanielJackson 10:46, 6 December 2014 (EST)