Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Abuse"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Protected "Conservapedia:Abuse" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite)))
 
(95 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''This is where you can report abuse of editing privileges. Please make notes short and concise. Unsigned posts will be removed.'''
+
#REDIRECT [[Conservapedia:Desk]]
−
__TOC__
 
−
Sysops, please move notes down to 'old alerts' once the incident is closed.
 
−
 
 
−
Archives:
 
−
[[Conservapedia:Abuse/Archive1|1]]
 
−
[[Conservapedia:Abuse/Archive2|2]]
 
−
[[Conservapedia:Abuse/Archive3|3]]
 
−
[[Conservapedia:Abuse/Archive4|4]]
 
−
 
 
−
Other links:
 
−
*[[Conservapedia:Abuse|Abuse Reporting]]
 
−
*[[Conservapedia:Sysop and Admin Abuse|Administrative Abuse]]
 
−
*[[Conservapedia:Articles for Deletion|Articles for Deletion]]
 
−
*[[:Category:Speedy deletion candidates|Articles for Speedy Deletion]]
 
−
*[[User:CPanel|Conservapedia Panel]]
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
==Current Alerts==
 
−
*{{alert|IDidItForIcewedge}} vandal. He is making inappropriate articles. --'''<font color="DarkGreen">Adrian</font><font color="Yellow">[[User talk:AdrianP|P]]</font>''' 19:47, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
:Blocked <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 20:29, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*[[User:Flippin|Flippin]] Posted he was leaving for a while, left attack on CP and other users on page. Blocked two weeks. Pray for his returning rested and positive! --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 16:15, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
**It appears that our "castles" are built out of very thin paper... gives me article/essay ideas, though. --[[User:JLindon|JLindon]] 16:23, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
::Actually I think Sysops pages are castles, where as normal editors only live in the fields in mud huts. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 16:25, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*{{alert|Cookieman}} - replacing pages with llamas. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 09:44, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*Blocked by PhillipRayment. <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 15:50, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*{{alert|SeanTheSheep}} 2nd warning. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:09, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
*{{alert|Favor}} sock of icewedge --'''<font color="DarkGreen">Adrian</font><font color="Yellow">[[User talk:AdrianP|P]]</font>''' 20:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
Proof? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:56, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
:He has a user box that says AmesG is the leader of conservapedia. And I have been seeing a lot of vandalism on this site that has been saying icewedge thinks AmesG should be unbanned. --'''<font color="DarkGreen">Adrian</font><font color="Yellow">[[User talk:AdrianP|P]]</font>''' 20:57, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
That's not proof. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:58, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
:It is easier to block and unblock later than to fix the pages that a person has vandalized. --'''<font color="DarkGreen">Adrian</font><font color="Yellow">[[User talk:AdrianP|P]]</font>''' 21:00, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
::AmesG does a better job of getting himself blocked than any Admin here.  He likes the attention, but I agree with DanH, that box isn't much "proof" and check it, several others do, or did, have that same box. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 21:36, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
*{{alert|Sacrificialzeus}} vandalized my user page and other pages. --'''<font color="DarkGreen">Adrian</font><font color="Yellow">[[User talk:AdrianP|P]]</font>''' 15:09, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*{{alert|Jesuslover143}} vandal. --'''<font color="DarkGreen">Adrian</font><font color="Yellow">[[User talk:AdrianP|P]]</font>''' 15:08, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*04:37, 8 May 2007, TK blocked Muschifresser  (infinite, account creation blocked) (Parodist/Subtle Vandal: "Owing to their diet of eucalyptus leaves, which contain a volatile oil, Koalas are highly flammable. For this reason, it is recommended to consume them raw in the form of a carpaccio or Koala tartare."Also has sock,LordWhimsey‎ ) 
 
−
*04:38, 8 May 2007, TK blocked LordWhimsey (contribs) (infinite, account creation blocked)  (Sock of Muschifresser )
 
−
 
 
−
*{{alert|YouGuysSuck}}, replaced Theory of Relativity with insults.
 
−
:Blocked infinitely <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 18:09, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*{{alert|Commodore Morgan}}, replacing user talk pages with "Icewedge has pwned Bronzefinger", in my case. [[User:Bronzefinger|Bronzefinger]] 13:04, 3 May 2007 (EDT) 
 
−
:Blocked infinitely <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 18:09, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*{{alert|Muschifresser}}, user name needs explanation. No apparent justification for blocking, but "Fresser" means "to eat like an animal," and "Muschi" is, uh, blocked by Google's Safe Search filtering. I'm about to leave a note on his Talk page. watch for his reply. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 08:50, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*{{alert|Swordofdestiny}} using specious reasoning to defend a troublemaker. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:11, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
:Blocked by ed poor <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 18:09, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*{{user|Boris Johnson, MP}} obscenity [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] <sup>[[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]]</sup> 15:45, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*{{user|The Black Angel of Death}} [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] <sup>[[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]]</sup> 15:40, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*{{user|Czolgolz}} - Karajou says he lied about sources. [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Ed_Poor#Zugstein] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 07:21, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
:User made a mistake <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 18:09, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*{{user|Tennis Sweatshirt}} I think he might be icewedge and he also posted "This place is pretty worthless so I would leave Tennis Sweatshirt 12:29, 29 April 2007 (EDT)." So I am not sure if you can trust any of his edits as being of any worth. --'''<font color="DarkGreen">[[User:AdrianP|Adrian]]</font>[[User talk:AdrianP|P]] 20:03, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*{{user|Pokeisthemon}} mostly hunch, but I'm sure it's a sock of Icewedge. Should be watched closely, if not pre-emptively blocked. [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 21:15, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
:Inconclusive on checkuser <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 16:20, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
::Cool. My apologies to Poke. [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 22:33, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*{{user|JoshuaZ}} Misleading edit summary + removed valid information from [[Noah]] article. Last 3 edits are questionable. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 05:11, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
** I reviewed his unproductive edits and a short block is appropriate.  Please proceed as you think best.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 08:59, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
*[[User:Fred]] -- questionable edits intended to embarass CP. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Censorship&diff=prev&oldid=46203][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Separation_of_church_and_state&diff=prev&oldid=41507]  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:46, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
*{{user|GeorgeJ.W.}} keeps to add seemingly parodic, biased nonsense to articles, often attacking free software for being "communist". --[[User:Hacker|Hacker]]<sup><code>([[User talk:Hacker|Write some code]] • [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]])</code></sup> 19:50, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
: Silly edits by GeorgeJ.W., I agree.  Not quite enough to block him, but he's getting there.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:38, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
::They're parodic, Andy, not silly, unless he's an utterly ignorant moron. --[[User:Hacker|Hacker]]<sup><code>([[User talk:Hacker|Write some code]] • [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]])</code></sup> 07:47, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
*{{user|Scorpion}}, vote fraud via sockpuppets. --[[User:Hacker|Hacker]]<sup><code>([[User talk:Hacker|Write some code]] • [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]])</code></sup> 21:53, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
*{{user|Hacker}} Review of Hacker's edits: slightly less than 500 edits, of which only about 6 are new entries and only about 10 are substantive edits of existing entries. One of the new entries was "Geek". Unless this improves quickly, I propose blocking this account because this violates the 90/10 rule.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:50, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
::That seems disingenuous. Yes, he has only a few new pages, but he has made a number of templates. And, maybe I read the "total" incorrectly, but it said 307 edits? At the risk of sounding tautological, this user is quite useful, IMHO. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 10:52, 24 April 2007 (EDT) 
 
−
 
 
−
*[[User:Flippin|Flippin]] defaced my user page [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Auld_Nick&oldid=151416 here] (my castle? [[User_talk:Aschlafly#User_page_a_person.27s_castle.3F|see here]]) also
 
−
:[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] added to [[User:Ian St John|Ian St John]]'s user page [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Ian_St_John&diff=151723&oldid=151721 here] and [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Ian_St_John&diff=151726&oldid=151723 here]. (his castle? [[User_talk:Aschlafly#User_page_a_person.27s_castle.3F|see here]]) [[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 15:17, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
===Dealt with===
 
−
*All socks.  Blocked infinite. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 23:23, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
#Hope (Latest: 02:38, 9 May 2007) (Earliest: 02:36, 9 May 2007) [3]
 
−
#Solstace (Latest: 01:46, 9 May 2007) (Earliest: 01:37, 9 May 2007) [2]
 
−
#Talk for me (Latest: 01:20, 8 May 2007) (Earliest: 01:20, 8 May 2007) [1]
 
−
*[[User:Auld Nick]]. In [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kilt&diff=152957&oldid=152944 this edit], he added [[:Image:Soldiers wearing Kilts.jpg]], with the edit comment "Image of soldiers in kilts" and the picture caption "Kilted Scottish Soldiers paying respect to their fallen comrades." He does not say in the talk page or in an edit comment why he chose an image in which one soldier's kilt has been lifted by wind to expose part of his bare buttocks. The use of such an image ought to have been discussed in Talk. If the point was to illustrate that kilts are worn without underwear, and if he sincerely thought such an image was appropriate, then the edit comment should have said something like "Image showing that kilts are worn without underwear." Therefore, I consider the edit comment misleading, and that trips my threshold for labeling it as "abuse." Put plainly, it's my opinion that Auld Nick is figuratively mooning Conservapedia. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:57, 10 May 2007 (EDT) P. S. Undoubtedly a copyright violation, too, although widely reproduced all over the Net. It appears to be an Associated Press photograph of one Lee Wotherspoon in Hong Kong on April 24, 1997. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 10:05, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*#Blocked for two hours. That'll larn 'im. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:40, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
*{{user|CaptainCAVEMAN}} ought to be blocked. [[User:Murray|Murray]] 10:45, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*#Blocked.
 
−
*{{user|Pussyfooter}} check out edits to [[Pudding]] [[User:Murray|Murray]] 17:31, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*#Blocked. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:36, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
*{{user|JeffersonDarcy}} He put "this user doesn't have a problem with calling a person a faggot" on my user page. He also deleted my post putting his name on the current alerts. --[[User:AdrianP|AdrianP]] 14:36, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*#Blocked for 1 week. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:43, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*{{user|Auld Nick}} User name means Satan ("Old Nick"). Uploaded picture of a man in a skirt and frilly blouse, mislabeled as "traditional attire". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 07:23, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*:- Ed, a kilt (pleated male skirt) and (on formal occasions) dress shirt with ruffles ''is'' traditional Scottish dress. [[User:Unthank|Unthank]] 07:26, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*#You are both on probation. Let's see your writing plans. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 07:57, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*Terreista and LambChop -blocked, socks of each other --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 16:23, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*{{user|Alfa Papa}} causing havoc. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] <sup>[[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]]</sup> 17:18, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
:It's a sock of Icewedge. [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 19:12, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
::'''Blocked''' by [[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 20:39, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*{{user|Aydindrill}} Causing havoc. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]]<sup>[[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]]</sup> 22:09, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
**'''Blocked''' by Aschlafly as a sock of icewedge. <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 12:47, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*[[User:Staple]] -- vandalism and other questionable content.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:24, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
** Feel free to make my one-month block permanent.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 08:59, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
** Staple has many counterproductive edits, and potentially offensive ones by labeling users with categories.  I lengthened his block to 1 month.  I don't know anything about a "swastika" but feel free to make his block permanent if that is what it sounds like.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:35, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
***He had a swastika on his userpage[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
 
−
****The [[:Category:Liberal Users]] he created as a subcat of [[:Category:Communists]] [http://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Liberal_Users]; he & I were the only [[:Category:Conservative Users]] in that cat after he put a swastika on his User page.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Staple&diff=prev&oldid=132099] At a minimum this is incivility and trolling, and has little to do with his own use of his User page.  A permanent block is warranted.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 02:04, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
** Swastika alone justifies it.  Good block.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:33, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*[[user:MontyZuma]], for instances of minor vandalism, and the creation of a profane page which involved moving an article into and changing the content.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 18:27, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
:I'm going to unblock him; this particular article he wrote is actually a dish, as I just found out.  My apologies.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 18:31, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
* Please investigate [[User:RSchlafly]]'s edits to [[Geocentric theory]]. They are simply cutting out well-justified and relevant material, and there is no rationale given for the decision. This is tantamount to vandalism. [[User:OfficerDibble]]
 
−
:* I second that.  [[User:RSchlafly]] hs been deleting and reverting a lot of my stuff and instead of debating the changes on the talk page he made statments like "Your beliefs are ridiculous".  He has now protected the page so I can't make any changes.[[User:Mmeelliissssaa|Mmeelliissssaa]] 13:22, 6 May 2007 (EDT) <sup>This user is a sock of Icewedge and has been blocked.</sup>
 
−
:::I oppose this alert, at the risk of POV-pushing, geocentrism is risible IMO. --[[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbohacker]]<sup>([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])</sup> 22:39, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
::::This is not the place for insults. Please see my detailed account on [[Talk:Geocentric theory]] before you make such judgements. --[[User:OfficerDibble|OfficerDibble]] 04:19, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*Insults? Where?  Please don't make random accusatory posts, OfficerDibble, okay? --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 05:01, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
::"I oppose this alert, at the risk of POV-pushing, geocentrism is '''risible'''" I take "Risible" to be insulting, since I have worked long and hard to make the points I have on the article. --[[User:OfficerDibble|OfficerDibble]] 05:27, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*Well, if you object to furious editing of your work, and debate about it, a wiki is the wrong place for you. Your tone borders on the dramatic. If you are into drama, might I suggest working on one of the acting/dramatic arts pages?  --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 05:33, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*:OfficerDibble and myself have been following the comandments of conservapedia, RSchlafly has been deleting our work with out discussing our valid points.  Be even objects to relevent bible verses being included.  And the page block prevents us from making any changes.  Clearly we are in the right here, as can plainly be seen in the history and talk page of the article.  Also I have not been blocked and I am not a "sock of icewedge".[[User:Mmeelliissssaa|Mmeelliissssaa]] 12:11, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
:'''No Action''' Rschlafly is a Sysop <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 12:12, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
::So are we to take this to mean that Sysops have carte blanche and can do whatever they want whenever? [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 14:44, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
:*You are to take it per the CP Guidelines. [[http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia_Guidelines]] Failure to follow the directions of an Administrator, as to what is, and is not, appropriate behavior/content/actions,  is a blockable offense. So is never-ending argument. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 19:32, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::TK, is a simple precise answer such as  '''''No''', Sysops do not have carte blanche and cannot do whatever they want whenever they want'' to much to ask? [[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 05:02, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
*When you leave your glass house, Auld Nick, perhaps you would make a better spokesperson for transparency and short comments.  Either you are completely obtuse, or just ignoring what the Guidelines say, for a better (read dramatic) retort.  Obviously at any website in the world, Administrators have more leeway than users. Just as that aging hippy Jimbo has at WP.  Anything else on your mind? --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 05:48, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::Thank you for the [[Conservapedia:Civility|civil]] answer. That has clarified things for me. [[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 06:49, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
:::I greatly resent users putting me on the spot about what another Sysop does or does not do.  First, it isn't fair or polite.  Secondly, if the intentions of the user were honorable, in my opinion, they wouldn't seek to make a public scene about it, and might, if they were using good manners, email about it.  Is that really so unreasonable? --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 09:03, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::::For the record we (or maybe just myself) didn't put you on the spot, the question was asked of Geo and you chose to respond.  And I disagree about the honorable thing, if it is honorable, why not talk about it in public to let others decide.  Doing things by email, behind everyone's backs make it seem like someone has something to hide. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 09:18, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
:::Well of course you do. But I was addressing Auld Nick.  Sorry, we all don't agree with your wiki ways of doing things.  It is a software, not a way of life. Your post smacks of Wikipedia bullying, it won't work here. You are now warned.  Don't continue this.  Take it up with the Sysop in question. Geo, BTW, answered you; "No Action". --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 09:32, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::When you say your wiki ways, are you refering to me or Auld Nick again? And am I warned or Auld Nick?  What wikipedia bullying tactics am I or Auld Nick using that are so different from you warning to block me or Auld Nick from this wiki?  It is very hard to fill in the blanks and figure out what you mean when replies are very cryptic and sarcastic.  And I did take it up with the sysop in question (as seen above), I asked Geo for an answer ''after'' he stated "No Action", he never replied. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 09:42, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
*Well, sorry to have confused you.  By the way, the Sysop in question is RSchlafly, not Geo, not me.  We merely attempted to provide answers, for which we have been whipped for.  Now, take me seriously, no more on this.  You have been given instruction by a Administrator to take it up with the Sysop you were/are complaining about, and told no action will be taken. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 09:54, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
*In response to the question by Jssr5, the reason for no action is that this is not the appropriate forum to debate tohe actions of a current Sysop. <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 22:17, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 

Latest revision as of 06:09, June 2, 2009

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Abuse&oldid=669498"