Difference between revisions of "ICON-RIDS"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (bold subject, grammar)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''ICON-RIDS''' is an acronym for the International Coalition of Non-Religious ID Scientists & Scholars. It was founded by [[William Brookfield]] with the intent of stopping the classification of [[Intelligent Design]] as a religious enterprise so that it can be rightly classified as science.<ref>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/icon-rids-non-religious-id-scientists-and-scholars/</ref>
+
'''ICON-RIDS''' is an acronym for the International Coalition of Non-Religious ID Scientists & Scholars. It was founded by [[William Brookfield]] with the intent of stopping the classification of [[intelligent design]] as a religious enterprise so that it can be classified as science.<ref>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/icon-rids-non-religious-id-scientists-and-scholars/</ref>
 +
 
 +
ICON-RIDS postulates that the processes of [[natural selection]] and [[random mutation]] are both destructive processes. Therefor making it logically impossible for new, presumably more complex, structures to arise from an inherently destructive process. Brookfield maintains "...origin of new species by means of natural selection is thus logically and causally bankrupt."<ref>http://icon-rids.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2006-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2007-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=1</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
[[category:political organization]]
+
[[Category:Political Organizations]]

Latest revision as of 03:01, January 7, 2013

ICON-RIDS is an acronym for the International Coalition of Non-Religious ID Scientists & Scholars. It was founded by William Brookfield with the intent of stopping the classification of intelligent design as a religious enterprise so that it can be classified as science.[1]

ICON-RIDS postulates that the processes of natural selection and random mutation are both destructive processes. Therefor making it logically impossible for new, presumably more complex, structures to arise from an inherently destructive process. Brookfield maintains "...origin of new species by means of natural selection is thus logically and causally bankrupt."[2]

References