Difference between revisions of "User talk:Kevin9mm"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Conservapedia is not a place for sexual humor. Take that to Uncyclopedia. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 19:33, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 
Conservapedia is not a place for sexual humor. Take that to Uncyclopedia. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 19:33, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
  
−
Sorry, was not making a joke.  Look at what liberals support in "sex ed."  I tried to word it as cleanly as possible.[[User:Kevin9mm]]
+
Sorry, was not making a joke.  Look at what liberals support in "sex ed."  I tried to word it as cleanly as possible. [[User:Kevin9mm|Kevin9mm]]
 +
 
 +
: Our commitment is first and foremost to a family-friendly resource, one that can be used by students.  So while I agree that liberal sex ed. needs to be exposed, let's not expose it here unless done very carefully and cleanly.  Thank you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:05, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
Right now I have it as "government "education" (indoctrination) about human reproduction."  Is this acceptable?  I do understand the need to keep this resource safe for women and children.  I hope this phraseology is sufficiently technical. [[User: Kevin9mm|Kevin9mm]]

Latest revision as of 00:08, March 12, 2007

Conservapedia is not a place for sexual humor. Take that to Uncyclopedia. MountainDew 19:33, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Sorry, was not making a joke. Look at what liberals support in "sex ed." I tried to word it as cleanly as possible. Kevin9mm

Our commitment is first and foremost to a family-friendly resource, one that can be used by students. So while I agree that liberal sex ed. needs to be exposed, let's not expose it here unless done very carefully and cleanly. Thank you.--Aschlafly 20:05, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Right now I have it as "government "education" (indoctrination) about human reproduction." Is this acceptable? I do understand the need to keep this resource safe for women and children. I hope this phraseology is sufficiently technical. Kevin9mm