Difference between revisions of "User talk:Realitycheck"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Realitycheck (talk | contribs) |
Realitycheck (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
::I have replied on your user page. I consider your block to be offensive, as there was as far as I could tell nothing at all wrong with my article additions. --[[User:Realitycheck|Realitycheck]] 01:45, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ::I have replied on your user page. I consider your block to be offensive, as there was as far as I could tell nothing at all wrong with my article additions. --[[User:Realitycheck|Realitycheck]] 01:45, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Using British/Australian spellings== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Your changing of the American "standardized" spelling to the British/Australian "standardised" is explicitly forbidden under the Conservapedia Commandments, and will result in a block if you continue to make that edit. --[[User:NVConservative|NVConservative]] 04:22, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: Oh sorry, my ignorance... wait a second. Or is it really? | ||
Latest revision as of 08:28, March 14, 2007
I am going to lift your block for obscenity, but will be required to reinstate it if you post any more inappropriate material. Please read our rules: this is a clean site. Thank you.--Aschlafly 12:59, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
- I have replied on your user page. I consider your block to be offensive, as there was as far as I could tell nothing at all wrong with my article additions. --Realitycheck 01:45, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Using British/Australian spellings
Your changing of the American "standardized" spelling to the British/Australian "standardised" is explicitly forbidden under the Conservapedia Commandments, and will result in a block if you continue to make that edit. --NVConservative 04:22, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
- Oh sorry, my ignorance... wait a second. Or is it really?