Difference between revisions of "User:MexMax/Contest3"

(stole format from crocoite)
 
 
(33 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''[[User:MexMax|My]] [[Contest3|Contest]] Statistics:'''
 
'''[[User:MexMax|My]] [[Contest3|Contest]] Statistics:'''
  
−
==Monday, November 12==
+
==Monday, November 12 (94 POINTS)==
 
<br />
 
<br />
 +
*Quality edit to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Republic_%28Politics%29&diff=332384&oldid=293988 Republic (Politics)]: 4 Points
 +
*Will return to this theme as well as important literature & poetry later.
 +
*Ordinary new Accretion Disk with link from Black Hole, 6pts (ordinary+minor edit)
 +
*Redirect Northern Lights to Aurora Borealis, 1/2 of new entry=2 points.
 +
*QEdit to Northern Lights (4).
 +
*Bright Terrain (new, 6)
 +
*Doppler Effect (minor edit, 2)
 +
*Stellar Classifications (new, 6)
 +
*Synchronous Rotation (new, 6)
 +
*Penumbra (new, 6)
 +
*Sunspot (new, 6)
 +
*Photosphere (new, 6)
 +
*Redirect of Facula to Sunspot, 2 points, adding info on it to Sunspot, 2 points (4) (54 thus far)
 +
*Poetic meter (new, 10)
 +
*Iambic pentameter (new, 10)
 +
*Iamb (new, 6)
 +
*Philip II (most wanted, 4+3=7)
 +
*Gilead (stub, most wanted, 4+3=7)
  
−
 
+
==Tuesday, November 13 (78)==
−
==Tuesday, November 13==
+
Ordinary new articles from US Govt' Source (6pts each): 13 so far.
 
<br />
 
<br />
  
 +
==Wednesday, November 14 (124 as of 12:36 EST)==
 +
*Short most-wanted articles (4+3=7 each): 6
 +
*Medium most-wanted articles (6+3=9 each): 2
 +
*Long most-wanted articles (10+3=13 each): 2
 +
*Medium regular articles (6): 1
 +
*32 from random business.
  
−
==Wednesday, November 14==
 
 
<br />
 
<br />
  
−
 
+
==Thursday, November 15 (153 and still going!)==
−
==Thursday, November 15==
+
*Minor edits (2p):
 +
*Major edits (4p):
 +
*Short wanted page (7p):
 +
*Short page (4p):
 
<br />
 
<br />
−
 
  
 
==Friday, November 16==
 
==Friday, November 16==
 +
*Minor edits (2p): III
 +
*Major edits (4p): I
 +
*Short wanted page (7p):
 +
*Short page (4p):
 
<br />
 
<br />
−
 
  
 
==Saturday, November 17==
 
==Saturday, November 17==
Line 31: Line 59:
 
==TOTAL POINTS:==
 
==TOTAL POINTS:==
 
<br />
 
<br />
 +
 +
==Not Yet Totaled==
 +
(32 added above the line)
 +
 +
I'm now going through articles using "random page" and zapping red links where appropriate; creating needed articles otherwise.  I've come to the conclusion that Conservapedia's articles are of good quality, and don't need that much work!

Latest revision as of 23:17, November 16, 2007

My Contest Statistics:

Monday, November 12 (94 POINTS)


  • Quality edit to Republic (Politics): 4 Points
  • Will return to this theme as well as important literature & poetry later.
  • Ordinary new Accretion Disk with link from Black Hole, 6pts (ordinary+minor edit)
  • Redirect Northern Lights to Aurora Borealis, 1/2 of new entry=2 points.
  • QEdit to Northern Lights (4).
  • Bright Terrain (new, 6)
  • Doppler Effect (minor edit, 2)
  • Stellar Classifications (new, 6)
  • Synchronous Rotation (new, 6)
  • Penumbra (new, 6)
  • Sunspot (new, 6)
  • Photosphere (new, 6)
  • Redirect of Facula to Sunspot, 2 points, adding info on it to Sunspot, 2 points (4) (54 thus far)
  • Poetic meter (new, 10)
  • Iambic pentameter (new, 10)
  • Iamb (new, 6)
  • Philip II (most wanted, 4+3=7)
  • Gilead (stub, most wanted, 4+3=7)

Tuesday, November 13 (78)

Ordinary new articles from US Govt' Source (6pts each): 13 so far.

Wednesday, November 14 (124 as of 12:36 EST)

  • Short most-wanted articles (4+3=7 each): 6
  • Medium most-wanted articles (6+3=9 each): 2
  • Long most-wanted articles (10+3=13 each): 2
  • Medium regular articles (6): 1
  • 32 from random business.


Thursday, November 15 (153 and still going!)

  • Minor edits (2p):
  • Major edits (4p):
  • Short wanted page (7p):
  • Short page (4p):


Friday, November 16

  • Minor edits (2p): III
  • Major edits (4p): I
  • Short wanted page (7p):
  • Short page (4p):


Saturday, November 17



Sunday, November 18



TOTAL POINTS:


Not Yet Totaled

(32 added above the line)

I'm now going through articles using "random page" and zapping red links where appropriate; creating needed articles otherwise. I've come to the conclusion that Conservapedia's articles are of good quality, and don't need that much work!