Difference between revisions of "User:SJP"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added one)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{userboxtop|SJP}}
 
{{User Critical}}
 
{{User Critical}}
 +
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=[[Image:bibleopened.jpeg|50px]] |info=This user believes the Bible to be a human product, and not some book from God.}}
 +
{{Userbox |#CCCCFF|#FFFFFF|[[image:UserCross.jpg|45px]]|<center>This user has accepted [[Jesus Christ]] as his Lord and Savior.</center>}}
 +
{{Userbox |#CCCCFF|#FFFFFF|[[image:UserCross.jpg|45px]]|<center>This user is a Liberal/Progressive Christian</center>}}
 +
{{userboxbottom}}
 +
[[Category:Christian Conservapedians]]
  
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=[[Image:bibleopened.jpeg|50px]] |info=This user believes the Bible to be a human product, and not some book comming from God.}}
+
== Purpose Here ==
 +
What is my purpose here at conservapedia? My purpose here is quite simple, it is too add information to this "encyclopedia". Knowledge is important, and I want to make it more avaliable to the public. Throughout out lives we all need knowledge, and an educated...period.
 +
 
 +
== Wikipedia or Conservapedia? ==
 +
What do I think is the better encyclopedia? Wikipedia of course! We (conservapedia) are not even an encyclopedia. We are a website full of conservative jargon. On the otherhand, wikipedia is an encyclopedia that contains information, and is less biased. I hate to break it too you, but conservapedia is '''far''' more biased than wikipedia.
 +
 
 +
As for wikipedia, it is biased, and not perfect. There is no sense of community there. I would much rather being here:) We are better than wikipedia when it comes to our community. The people I have had contact with here have been very friendly. I have not ran into a single unfriendly person here so far. Wikipedia has friendly people, but the percent of friendly users here is higher.
 +
 
 +
In conclusion, wikipedia and conservapedia are equal. This is a friendly place too work, but when it comes to doing research, I would go to wikipedia first.

Latest revision as of 19:26, November 21, 2007

SJP
Bibleopened.jpeg This user is convinced of the need for critical, academic study of the Bible.
Bibleopened.jpeg This user believes the Bible to be a human product, and not some book from God.
UserCross.jpg
This user has accepted Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior.
UserCross.jpg
This user is a Liberal/Progressive Christian

Purpose Here

What is my purpose here at conservapedia? My purpose here is quite simple, it is too add information to this "encyclopedia". Knowledge is important, and I want to make it more avaliable to the public. Throughout out lives we all need knowledge, and an educated...period.

Wikipedia or Conservapedia?

What do I think is the better encyclopedia? Wikipedia of course! We (conservapedia) are not even an encyclopedia. We are a website full of conservative jargon. On the otherhand, wikipedia is an encyclopedia that contains information, and is less biased. I hate to break it too you, but conservapedia is far more biased than wikipedia.

As for wikipedia, it is biased, and not perfect. There is no sense of community there. I would much rather being here:) We are better than wikipedia when it comes to our community. The people I have had contact with here have been very friendly. I have not ran into a single unfriendly person here so far. Wikipedia has friendly people, but the percent of friendly users here is higher.

In conclusion, wikipedia and conservapedia are equal. This is a friendly place too work, but when it comes to doing research, I would go to wikipedia first.