m (related to?)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{welcome|sig=[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 21:19, 8 November 2009 (EST)}}
 +
 
==Relation==
 
==Relation==
 
Are you in any way related to a Michael or John Claypool? o_0 [[User:Kektklik|Fuzzy]] 21:08, 25 February 2008 (EST)
 
Are you in any way related to a Michael or John Claypool? o_0 [[User:Kektklik|Fuzzy]] 21:08, 25 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
 +
== Positive contribution? ==
 +
 +
Hello Claypool, It will be nice if we all could get along in this place. Please start some positive contributions instead of arguing. Thanks--[[User:Heffalump|Heffalump]] 13:46, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Claypool, you didn't heed the advice above from 18 months ago.  You're still all talk and no substantive contributions.  Is that pattern going to change?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:45, 8 November 2009 (EST)

Latest revision as of 02:19, November 9, 2009

Welcome!

Hello, Claypool, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, Claypool!


Joaquín Martínez 21:19, 8 November 2009 (EST)

Relation

Are you in any way related to a Michael or John Claypool? o_0 Fuzzy 21:08, 25 February 2008 (EST)


Positive contribution?

Hello Claypool, It will be nice if we all could get along in this place. Please start some positive contributions instead of arguing. Thanks--Heffalump 13:46, 21 April 2008 (EDT)

Claypool, you didn't heed the advice above from 18 months ago. You're still all talk and no substantive contributions. Is that pattern going to change?--Andy Schlafly 20:45, 8 November 2009 (EST)