Difference between revisions of "User talk:AndrasK"
Feebasfactor (talk | contribs) (hello, here is a tip...) |
m (Reverted edits by Jacquelynn (talk) to last revision by Aschlafly) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | I would strongly suggest... you familiarize yourself with the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|90/10 rule]], as it is not infrequently wielded against perceived troublemakers. In other words, please make some useful additions to non-controversial articles, in order to demonstrate your desire to improve the site overall. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 23:06, 27 April 2008 (EDT) | |
| − | I | + | |
| + | Your profile offends me greatly. You are such a liberal and I cannot even understand why you were allowed on this site. --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 16:20, 22 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Conservative Style== | ||
| + | Do not replace the material I deleted. It is not what Andy agreed to, as you are well aware, and it amounts to Liberal vandalism, as he predicted it might. If you reinsert the offending material you will be blocked. Thank you. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 14:36, 16 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Block== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Welcome withdrawn and account blocked. Please review [[Wikipedia:Avoid personal remarks]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 20:53, 13 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Warning of Blocking == | ||
| + | |||
| + | AndrasK, you're the next account to be blocked if you insist on using [[Talk:PNAS Response to Letter]] to make non-substantive rants. There are five points in the letter and either address them in a substantive way or make non-substantive edits elsewhere.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:26, 15 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == McCain == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks for reverting that vandal! --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Administrator</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 20:25, 7 January 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Congratulations == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Congratulations on your MIT acceptance!!!! That's phenomenal!!!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:17, 10 May 2009 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:28, June 29, 2012
I would strongly suggest... you familiarize yourself with the 90/10 rule, as it is not infrequently wielded against perceived troublemakers. In other words, please make some useful additions to non-controversial articles, in order to demonstrate your desire to improve the site overall. Feebasfactor 23:06, 27 April 2008 (EDT)
Your profile offends me greatly. You are such a liberal and I cannot even understand why you were allowed on this site. --IlTrovatore 16:20, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
Conservative Style
Do not replace the material I deleted. It is not what Andy agreed to, as you are well aware, and it amounts to Liberal vandalism, as he predicted it might. If you reinsert the offending material you will be blocked. Thank you. Bugler 14:36, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
Block
Welcome withdrawn and account blocked. Please review Wikipedia:Avoid personal remarks. --Ed Poor Talk 20:53, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
Warning of Blocking
AndrasK, you're the next account to be blocked if you insist on using Talk:PNAS Response to Letter to make non-substantive rants. There are five points in the letter and either address them in a substantive way or make non-substantive edits elsewhere.--Aschlafly 20:26, 15 September 2008 (EDT)
McCain
Thanks for reverting that vandal! --₮K/Administrator/Talk 20:25, 7 January 2009 (EST)
Congratulations
Congratulations on your MIT acceptance!!!! That's phenomenal!!!--Andy Schlafly 09:17, 10 May 2009 (EDT)