Difference between revisions of "Intelligent design of life"
(a scientist can argue for intelligent design based upon scientific evidence without basing that argument on a prior belief in God) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: clean up & uniformity) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A scientist can make arguments for the intelligent design of life or the universe without making God a premise in the argument - that is, a scientist can argue for [[intelligent design]] based upon scientific evidence (as some of our scientists are doing) without basing that argument on a prior belief in [[God]]. [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?id=349] | A scientist can make arguments for the intelligent design of life or the universe without making God a premise in the argument - that is, a scientist can argue for [[intelligent design]] based upon scientific evidence (as some of our scientists are doing) without basing that argument on a prior belief in [[God]]. [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?id=349] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Quotes]] | ||
Latest revision as of 05:24, July 12, 2016
A scientist can make arguments for the intelligent design of life or the universe without making God a premise in the argument - that is, a scientist can argue for intelligent design based upon scientific evidence (as some of our scientists are doing) without basing that argument on a prior belief in God. [1]