Difference between revisions of "Testability of intelligent design"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA: :It is sometimes said that the hypothesis that there is a designer is untestable. This is false. It is testable, and the tes...) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) m (→top: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.pbs.org → https://www.pbs.org) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA]]: | + | [[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA (PBS)|NOVA]]: |
| − | :It is sometimes said that the hypothesis that there is a [[Intelligent Designer|designer]] is untestable. This is false. It is testable, and the test is [[Darwinian evolution]]. The claim of the [[ | + | :"''It is sometimes said that the hypothesis that there is a [[Intelligent Designer|designer]] is untestable. This is false. It is testable, and the test is [[Darwinian evolution]]. The claim of the evolutionary [[biology|biologists]] is that unintelligent causes did the whole job. If they can prove it, then the counter-hypothesis that you need intelligence has been tested, and it has been shown to be false.''"<ref>https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html</ref> |
| − | See also | + | ==See also== |
*[[Creationism]] | *[[Creationism]] | ||
| + | *[[Falsifiability of evolution]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Intelligent Design]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:37, April 9, 2019
Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA:
- "It is sometimes said that the hypothesis that there is a designer is untestable. This is false. It is testable, and the test is Darwinian evolution. The claim of the evolutionary biologists is that unintelligent causes did the whole job. If they can prove it, then the counter-hypothesis that you need intelligence has been tested, and it has been shown to be false."[1]