Difference between revisions of "Evolution by natural selection"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA: :If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental assumption on which i...)
 
m (→‎top: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.pbs.org → https://www.pbs.org)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA]]:
+
[[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA (PBS)|NOVA]]:
−
:If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental [[assumption]] on which it's based, is a legitimate part of [[science]] as well. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html Intelligent Design on Trial - In Defense of Intelligent Design]
+
:If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental [[assumption]] on which it's based, is a legitimate part of [[science]] as well. [https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html Intelligent Design on Trial - In Defense of Intelligent Design]
 +
[[Category:Evolution]]

Latest revision as of 11:57, April 9, 2019

Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA:

If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental assumption on which it's based, is a legitimate part of science as well. Intelligent Design on Trial - In Defense of Intelligent Design