Difference between revisions of "Diagonalization"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Fixed this load of absolute rubbish.)
(Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: Therefore → Therefore, (3))
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor|George Cantor]], a [[Germany|German]] [[Mathematician|mathematician]]. He used it to show that the [[Cardinality|cardinality]] of the [[Real_number|real numbers]] is not equal to the cardinality of the [[Natural_number|natural numbers]], thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not countable.  
+
{{Math-h}}
 +
 
 +
'''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor|Georg Cantor]], a [[Germany|German]] [[mathematician]]. He used it to show that the [[real number]]s can not be put into [[bijection|one-to-one correspondence]] with the [[natural number]]s, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not [[countable]].  This method can also be applied in other contexts, to show that two sets can't have a correspondence.  For example, it can be used to show that no set can be in 1-1 correspondence with the set of all of its subsets.
  
 
==Proof of the non-countability of real numbers==
 
==Proof of the non-countability of real numbers==
−
There exists a map <math>f:[0,1]\rightarrow\mathbb{R}</math> (in fact all infintitly supported probability distribution does this). Therefor there are as many number in <math>[0,1]</math> as <math>\mathbb{R}</math>.
+
First, we create a 1-1 correspondence between the entire real line <math>\mathbb{R}\,</math> and the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>. This function:
 +
:<math>y = \frac{\tan^{-1}(x)}{\pi} + \frac{1}{2}</math>
 +
maps the entire real line to the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>.  Its inverse:
 +
:<math>x = \tan(\pi(y - 1/2))\,</math>
 +
maps the open interval to the entire real line.
  
−
We will now use [[proof by contradiction]] to show that the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are uncountable.
+
This means that the real numbers are in 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers if and only if the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math> is in correspondence.
  
−
Assume that that they are countable then we can list them as such,
+
We will now use [[proof by contradiction]] to show that this open interval has no such correspondence, and thus it, and the real line as a whole, are [[uncountable]].
 +
 
 +
Assume the numbers in this open interval are in a 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers.  Then we can make an (infinite) sequential list of them, like this:
  
 
<math>
 
<math>
Line 37: Line 45:
 
<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>.
 
<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>.
  
−
Therefor <math>a</math> is not in the list and so we have a contradition so our assumption is false hand the number <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefor <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.
+
Therefore, <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefore, <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.<ref>A. N. Kolmogorov, ''Introductory Real Analysis''. ISBN 978-0486612263.</ref>
 +
 
 +
==Diagonalization and the Existence of God==
 +
 
 +
Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to [[Saint Anselm]]'s [[ontological argument]] for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore, God exists.<ref>http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130</ref>
 +
 
 +
However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.<ref>''Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds'', Arkady Plotnitsky. In ''After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory'' Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.</ref>
  
−
== References ==
+
==References==
  
−
Komolgorov, ''Introduction to Real Analysis''. (You can find it inalmost any book store).
+
{{reflist|2}}
  
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]
 +
[[Category:Philosophy]]

Latest revision as of 15:48, July 15, 2016

This article/section deals with mathematical concepts appropriate for late high school or early college.

Diagonalization is a technique first used by Georg Cantor, a German mathematician. He used it to show that the real numbers can not be put into one-to-one correspondence with the natural numbers, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not countable. This method can also be applied in other contexts, to show that two sets can't have a correspondence. For example, it can be used to show that no set can be in 1-1 correspondence with the set of all of its subsets.

Proof of the non-countability of real numbers

First, we create a 1-1 correspondence between the entire real line Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathbb{R}\,} and the open interval Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle (0, 1)\,} . This function:

Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle y = \frac{\tan^{-1}(x)}{\pi} + \frac{1}{2}}

maps the entire real line to the open interval Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle (0, 1)\,} . Its inverse:

Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle x = \tan(\pi(y - 1/2))\,}

maps the open interval to the entire real line.

This means that the real numbers are in 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers if and only if the open interval is in correspondence.

We will now use proof by contradiction to show that this open interval has no such correspondence, and thus it, and the real line as a whole, are uncountable.

Assume the numbers in this open interval are in a 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers. Then we can make an (infinite) sequential list of them, like this:

Where

Construct the number,

, where


when Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle a_{ii}\neq1} and Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle a_{i}=2} when Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle a_{ii}=1} .

Therefore, Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle a} is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle [0,1]} are not countable. Therefore, Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mathbb{R}} is uncountable.[1]

Diagonalization and the Existence of God

Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to Saint Anselm's ontological argument for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore, God exists.[2]

However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.[3]

References

  1. ↑ A. N. Kolmogorov, Introductory Real Analysis. ISBN 978-0486612263.
  2. ↑ http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130
  3. ↑ Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds, Arkady Plotnitsky. In After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.