Difference between revisions of "Diagonalization"

(Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: Therefore → Therefore, (3))
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor|George Cantor]], a [[Germany|German]] [[Mathematician|mathematician]]. He used it to show that the [[Cardinality|cardinality]] of the [[Real_number|real numbers]] is not equal to the cardinality of the [[Natural_number|natural numbers]], thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not countable. This method can be applied to any infinite set to construct an even larger infinite set.
+
{{Math-h}}
 +
 
 +
'''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor|Georg Cantor]], a [[Germany|German]] [[mathematician]]. He used it to show that the [[real number]]s can not be put into [[bijection|one-to-one correspondence]] with the [[natural number]]s, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not [[countable]]. This method can also be applied in other contexts, to show that two sets can't have a correspondence.  For example, it can be used to show that no set can be in 1-1 correspondence with the set of all of its subsets.
  
 
==Proof of the non-countability of real numbers==
 
==Proof of the non-countability of real numbers==
−
There exists a map <math>f:[0,1]\rightarrow\mathbb{R}</math> (in fact all infinitly supported probability distribution does this). Therefor there are as many number in <math>[0,1]</math> as <math>\mathbb{R}</math>.
+
First, we create a 1-1 correspondence between the entire real line <math>\mathbb{R}\,</math> and the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>.  This function:
 +
:<math>y = \frac{\tan^{-1}(x)}{\pi} + \frac{1}{2}</math>
 +
maps the entire real line to the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>. Its inverse:
 +
:<math>x = \tan(\pi(y - 1/2))\,</math>
 +
maps the open interval to the entire real line.
 +
 
 +
This means that the real numbers are in 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers if and only if the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math> is in correspondence.
  
−
We will now use [[proof by contradiction]] to show that the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are uncountable.
+
We will now use [[proof by contradiction]] to show that this open interval has no such correspondence, and thus it, and the real line as a whole, are [[uncountable]].
  
−
Assume that that they are countable then we can list them (without use of the [[Axiom of Choice]]) as such,
+
Assume the numbers in this open interval are in a 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers.  Then we can make an (infinite) sequential list of them, like this:
  
 
<math>
 
<math>
Line 37: Line 45:
 
<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>.
 
<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>.
  
−
Therefor <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a contradition and our assumption is false, the number <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefor <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.<ref>Komolgorov, ''Introduction to Real Analysis''. (You can find it inalmost any book store).</ref>
+
Therefore, <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefore, <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.<ref>A. N. Kolmogorov, ''Introductory Real Analysis''. ISBN 978-0486612263.</ref>
  
 
==Diagonalization and the Existence of God==
 
==Diagonalization and the Existence of God==
  
−
Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to [[Saint_Anselm|Saint Anselm]]'s argument for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore God exists.<ref>http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130</ref>
+
Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to [[Saint Anselm]]'s [[ontological argument]] for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore, God exists.<ref>http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130</ref>
  
−
However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.<ref>''Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds'', Arkady Plotnitsky. In ''After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory'' Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.</ref> This seeming [[Disprove|disproof]] of the existence of God has cast doubt on the validity of Cantor's diagonalization.
+
However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.<ref>''Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds'', Arkady Plotnitsky. In ''After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory'' Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
Line 49: Line 57:
 
{{reflist|2}}
 
{{reflist|2}}
  
−
[[Category:Mathematics]][[Category:Philosophy]]
+
[[Category:Mathematics]]
 +
[[Category:Philosophy]]

Latest revision as of 15:48, July 15, 2016

This article/section deals with mathematical concepts appropriate for late high school or early college.

Diagonalization is a technique first used by Georg Cantor, a German mathematician. He used it to show that the real numbers can not be put into one-to-one correspondence with the natural numbers, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not countable. This method can also be applied in other contexts, to show that two sets can't have a correspondence. For example, it can be used to show that no set can be in 1-1 correspondence with the set of all of its subsets.

Proof of the non-countability of real numbers

First, we create a 1-1 correspondence between the entire real line   and the open interval  . This function:

 

maps the entire real line to the open interval Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle (0, 1)\,} . Its inverse:

Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle x = \tan(\pi(y - 1/2))\,}

maps the open interval to the entire real line.

This means that the real numbers are in 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers if and only if the open interval   is in correspondence.

We will now use proof by contradiction to show that this open interval has no such correspondence, and thus it, and the real line as a whole, are uncountable.

Assume the numbers in this open interval are in a 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers. Then we can make an (infinite) sequential list of them, like this:

 

 

 

 

 

Where  

Construct the number,

 , where


  when   and   when  .

Therefore,   is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in   are not countable. Therefore,   is uncountable.[1]

Diagonalization and the Existence of God

Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to Saint Anselm's ontological argument for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore, God exists.[2]

However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.[3]

References

  1. ↑ A. N. Kolmogorov, Introductory Real Analysis. ISBN 978-0486612263.
  2. ↑ http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130
  3. ↑ Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds, Arkady Plotnitsky. In After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.