Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pluto"
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{simulsubmitted|user=TerryH|site user=Temlakos}} | {{simulsubmitted|user=TerryH|site user=Temlakos}} | ||
So what if it's not accountable? Science is most decidedly not a democracy. --[[User:John|John]] 00:06, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | So what if it's not accountable? Science is most decidedly not a democracy. --[[User:John|John]] 00:06, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Change Suggestion=== | ||
| + | I suggest we remove the following statement from the article: "Recently there have been efforts to restore Pluto's status as a planet.[3]" | ||
| + | The reference is merely a link to a petition on a site with 51 signatures. Using that logic anyone could create a petition on any subject(X), link to it and claim "Recently there have been efforts to X." Opinions? [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 15:18, 3 April 2013 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | As there appear to be no objections, I'm going to go ahead and make the changes I mentioned for the reason listed above. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 22:44, 4 April 2013 (EDT) | ||
===Problems for evolutionary theory=== | ===Problems for evolutionary theory=== | ||
I am changing the heading for this section, as evolution has absolutely nothing to do with astrophysics. Evolution is a theory in the field of biology. If you have a problem, speak up, as I cannot see why this needs to be included if it makes no sense. [[User:Jparenti|Jparenti]] 12:39, 26 June 2008 (EDT) | I am changing the heading for this section, as evolution has absolutely nothing to do with astrophysics. Evolution is a theory in the field of biology. If you have a problem, speak up, as I cannot see why this needs to be included if it makes no sense. [[User:Jparenti|Jparenti]] 12:39, 26 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have changed this section again, under the new heading that was created yesterday by another user. I believe it more accurately reflects the reference already cited in the section. I disposed of the part that discusses the capture theory, as it is no longer a viable option for Pluto's origin and no one really thinks that's how it happened anymore anyway. [[User:Jparenti|Jparenti]] 11:15, 27 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:44, April 5, 2013
| ! | This article or part thereof was also submitted to CreationWiki. The submitted text was written by me, TerryH, and submitted to CreationWiki, within seven days of its submission here, under the name Temlakos. It does not include contributions made by others on that site. | 
|
So what if it's not accountable? Science is most decidedly not a democracy. --John 00:06, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
Change Suggestion
I suggest we remove the following statement from the article: "Recently there have been efforts to restore Pluto's status as a planet.[3]" The reference is merely a link to a petition on a site with 51 signatures. Using that logic anyone could create a petition on any subject(X), link to it and claim "Recently there have been efforts to X." Opinions? Fnarrow 15:18, 3 April 2013 (EDT)
As there appear to be no objections, I'm going to go ahead and make the changes I mentioned for the reason listed above. Fnarrow 22:44, 4 April 2013 (EDT)
Problems for evolutionary theory
I am changing the heading for this section, as evolution has absolutely nothing to do with astrophysics. Evolution is a theory in the field of biology. If you have a problem, speak up, as I cannot see why this needs to be included if it makes no sense. Jparenti 12:39, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
I have changed this section again, under the new heading that was created yesterday by another user. I believe it more accurately reflects the reference already cited in the section. I disposed of the part that discusses the capture theory, as it is no longer a viable option for Pluto's origin and no one really thinks that's how it happened anymore anyway. Jparenti 11:15, 27 June 2008 (EDT)