Difference between revisions of "User talk:CSGuy"

Latest revision as of 01:34, January 15, 2011

Thanks

Thanks for the comment on the name. :-) I like your outlook (most articles on Conservapedia are horribly narrow-minded and Conservo-centric). I've tried to make some minor edits to combat this (i.e., changing the first line in the article "God" from "God is the sovereign creator and eternal ruler of all things and beings that exist" to "In most monotheistic religions (and in particular the three Judeo-Christian religions), God is the sovereign creator and eternal ruler of all things and beings that exist"). I feel like a lot of people here are a bit blunt though (especially the serious arguments that people have about whether or not people should make a cure for homosexuality). Overall it's both funny and frustrating to see things like that, but I think I'm content creating and editing more secular pages (right now I'm obsessing over pages involving New York City). -Ilikecake 21:02, 14 November 2008 (EST)

Please don't insert ideological "fact" tags. Instead, look for the reference that you think is necessary. It's often not hard to find. Thanks.--Aschlafly 23:52, 14 November 2008 (EST)

Unclude

If there was an unclude what would you like it to mean? :-)AlanE 20:17, 15 November 2008 (EST)

It's vs. its - this is NOT hard!

Tell me about it. Beginning to think it might be worth creating a page to fully explain how apostraphes work with it's and its.--Ieuan 16:02, 17 November 2008 (EST)

Star Trek 2009

Did you see the movie as well? I thought it was one of the greatest movies I've ever seen. --JY23 11:41, 10 July 2009 (EDT)

I did, and I agree. -CSGuy 20:44, 10 July 2009 (EDT)

2011

Welcome back. --Joaquín Martínez 20:34, 14 January 2011 (EST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-What for? You made a nice [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Premise_Media&curid=64101&diff=437855&oldid=437666&rcid=475113 link correction] here. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:57, 23 April 2008 (EDT)
+== Thanks ==
-Please don't put sarcasm or foul language in the edit summaries.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:34, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
+Thanks for the comment on the name. :-) I like your outlook (most articles on Conservapedia are horribly narrow-minded and Conservo-centric). I've tried to make some minor edits to combat this (i.e., changing the first line in the article "God" from "God is the sovereign creator and eternal ruler of all things and beings that exist" to "In most monotheistic religions (and in particular the three Judeo-Christian religions), God is the sovereign creator and eternal ruler of all things and beings that exist"). I feel like a lot of people here are a bit blunt though (especially the serious arguments that people have about whether or not people should make a cure for homosexuality). Overall it's both funny and frustrating to see things like that, but I think I'm content creating and editing more secular pages (right now I'm obsessing over pages involving New York City). -[[User:Ilikecake|Ilikecake]] 21:02, 14 November 2008 (EST)
-:Huh? -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 21:32, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
-CSGuy, don't post a [[Parthian Shot]] on my User talk page.  Thanks and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:56, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
+Please don't insert ideological "fact" tags.  Instead, look for the reference that you think is necessary.  It's often not hard to find.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:52, 14 November 2008 (EST)
-:Is that a "no"? -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 21:29, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
-== quick question ==
+==Unclude==
+If there was an ''unclude'' what would you like it to mean? :-)[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 20:17, 15 November 2008 (EST)
-How long do you think it will take to fix the typos, etc.  in the atheism article?  I want to ask other conservative websites to link to the article and as I have had a lot to do I have not had time to proofread it with a fine tooth comb. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:40, 5 May 2008 (EDT)
-:I'm not sure; it's a long article. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 20:41, 5 May 2008 (EDT)
-:::A very rough guess? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:43, 5 May 2008 (EDT)
-Can the atheism article be opened I want to move over my version to the atheism article --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 20:56, 5 May 2008 (EDT)
+==It's vs. its - this is NOT hard!==
-== atheism article ==
+Tell me about it.  Beginning to think it might be worth creating a page to fully explain how apostraphes work with ''it's'' and ''its''.--[[User:Ieuan|Ieuan]] 16:02, 17 November 2008 (EST)
-CsGuy,
+==Star Trek 2009==
+Did you see the movie as well? I thought it was one of the greatest movies I've ever seen. --[[User:JY23|JY23]] 11:41, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
+:I did, and I agree. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 20:44, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
-I would like to work with you and Deborah on any improvements (typos, rewording, etc) that need to be done on the atheism article. I served at as a writing tutor in the past at a major university.  I do have an excellent plan on how we can work together. In the meantime, I deleted the atheism/draft space you had and hope you don't mind.
+== 2011 ==
-I am guessing that you are a computer person given your username CSGuy.  I would like to work with you and Deborah and use a modular approach. Specifically, we could work on the article by us cutting and pasting a section of the article and then work on that section together.  Then cut the improved section into the article and then erase the draft.  Then repeat that approach until we are done. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:33, 6 May 2008 (EDT)
+Welcome back. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 20:34, 14 January 2011 (EST)
-== Warning of Account Blocking ==
-Harshly disparaging comments in the edit summary are neither welcome nor justified by your edits.  Please refrain from such improper editorializing in the future.  Thanks and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:06, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
-== The blocked vandal already looked foolish ==
-I just wanted people to know how truly foolish they are. If someone is going to criticize another person's intelligence, making basic spelling errors while doing so is amusingly ironic. It doesn't matter if the fool corrected the errors. They should not have been made or at the very least posted in the first place. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 22:49, 5 August 2008 (EDT)